• obsoleteacct@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    21 minutes ago

    This is going to result in either the left arming themselves in a way that will give them political power comparable to the right.

    Or the courts will set a legal precedent for gun control regulations.

    While I’m disgusted by the fact that it’s a targeted act of persecution, this could be the Trump DOJ setting up a long-term win for the left.

  • SabinStargem@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 minutes ago

    Trans folks, get your guns while you can. They might be the difference between freedom or going to RFK’s “wellness” farms. As an autistic who will someday be targeted, I intend to stand on the line of battle with you.

    • InputZero@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 minutes ago

      Ah see you’re making a common mistake when reading the law. Republican’s shall not be infringed, Democrats shall be infringed. It’s a common mistake to assume the Republicans will respect others rights, they don’t. They want all the rights for themselves and laws to apply to everyone else.

  • Dyskolos@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 hours ago

    Hahaha…omg. USA. You’re always good for a laugh. A sad laugh, as there’s always comedy in tragedy and vice versa. But a laugh.

    If I’d be lqbtq I’d probably already packing bags for a nice emigration into universal healthcare instead of fascicm and stupidity. Most anywhere else sounds like a nice destination!

  • missfrizzle@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    11 hours ago

    welp, that tears it. time to buy my first gun, while I still can. I’m not a big fan of guns but fuck if I’m going to let myself and my community be disarmed by the fascists. I’m not going quietly if they send us to the camps.

    • Itdidnttrickledown@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      If you do and have not used one before please get training in the proper operation of it. Even if its from a book. Practice until you are comfortable with it. Otherwise you may end up shooting yourself or someone you care about by accident. You should know how it works and how to break down and clean it yourself.

    • humanoidchaos@lemmy.cif.su
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      6 hours ago

      I hate to break it to you, but that’s exactly what they want.

      They want more people to buy guns, because that’s more power for those in the industry.

      The money from these sales will go towards getting republicans elected.

  • tradingcronjobsforsmack@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Liberals have no one to blame but themselves for causing this situation.

    In order to get any mental health issue insured, a person needs to get a mental health diagnosis.

    Mental health providers almost always diagnose someone with a DSM illness just to get coverage. I have never heard of someone seeing a psychiatrist or therapist and not getting any diagnosis at all.

    Liberals also allowed being transgender to be a DSM illness so that transgender people could get medical coverage, which is a dishonest way of conceptualizing gender identity. It is very hard to get insurance to cover anything without that diagnosis.

    Liberals have then linked gun purchases to a lack of mental health diagnosis in a misguided effort to strip Americans of the right to bear arms instead of encouraging more people to own guns, encouraged gun training, and encouraged free mental health care that has extreme privacy and no links to any status within society.

    As a result, people who want access to guns do not seek mental health care since mental health care is expensive and can limit rights within society. And now those who have naively used mental health services and been labeled in order to get costs covered can be marginalized even more.

    This is a disaster that liberals created by attacking 2nd Amendment rights. Instead of giving transgender people mental health diagnoses when they identify as trans, society should be giving these trans people free health insurance, free therapy that is completely private and will never result in a loss of freedom, and extensive and comprehensive free weapons training.

    People who support trans people and support inclusion need to stop allowing Republican conservative pieces of shit to claim sole support for the 2nd Amendment. This should be a wake up call to all Trans people that if you can legally get armed, do it now, and stop seeing this Mental Health/Liberal coalition suppressing 2nd Amendment rights as being in anyone’s interest. The second amendment was never meant to be limited and radical activist liberals and conservatives have perverted the intent of the founding fathers with the result that good upstanding trans people may lose their right to carry guns.

    • confusedbytheBasics@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 hour ago

      I have never heard of someone seeing a psychiatrist or therapist and not getting any diagnosis at all.

      I have twice. Two different therapists, after three sessions, told me I was well adjusted and experiencing normal emotional response to stressful events. One told me she saw no reason to schedule additional meetings. The other said I could keep visiting him but he couldn’t bill insurance since there was no diagnosis.

      That said, this story is unique among everyone I’ve ever spoken to about it.

  • TigerAce@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Yeah, after all those mass shootings done by transgenders, I understand.

    Wait, how many of the long list of mass shootings were done by transgenders? What is the muder rate in percentage by transgenders compared to sisgenders?

  • Professorozone@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    How would this stop them? Couldn’t they just use the same gun show/online loopholes (the many way ways to acquire a gun in America)everyone else does?

    EDIT: changed the phrasing to more accurately reflect the reality to satisfy people’s dependence on nitpicking details at the cost of understanding the actual point.

    • lando55@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      I didn’t want to spark a semantic debate, I am genuinely curious how people perceive firearm sales and acquisition in the US.

      In my experience of having purchased and sold a few guns over the years, it’s not quite as straightforward as most would believe. The laws vary by state, but in my cases all private sales (even at gun shows) are subject to background checks facilitated by an FFL holder (think gun store or pawn shop) and any applicable waiting periods.

      That’s not to say back-alley deals don’t still occur and that unregulated states do a great job of tracking ownership, but the risk that private firearm sales and straw purchases pose are largely mitigated by the fact that most people don’t want to have their name linked to a firearm that was sold to some unsavory individual.

    • Event_Horizon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Probably. I think this is more about providing an excuse for jailing any trans who choose to own a firearm, rather than stopping them

    • lando55@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Serious question: do you believe that you can purchase a firearm from a commercial dealer online or at a gun show without regulation? Because in most cases, that simply isn’t true.

      • Professorozone@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        7 hours ago

        I’ll admit I’m not educated on the subject but it was my understanding that there is a loophole for gun shows.

        In a country where there are more guns than people, I don’t believe the barriers to entry for gun ownership for someone who really wants one are substantial. So fundamentally, yes, I do believe this.

        • bigfondue@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          7 hours ago

          The loophole is for private sales. A person can sell their personal firearms to another person without going through a licensed dealer, which means no background check. A gun dealer at a gun show needs to do a background check, but if someone just wants to sell some of their guns at the show, they can just take the cash no questions asked. It applies to GunBroker too, which is like ebay for guns.

          • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            4 hours ago

            I’ve never been to a gun show, but I went to a guitar show as a teenager, looking to buy a bass, and I ended up chatting up some dude carrying his Rickenbacker 4001 around in a case, looking to sell.

            We went out to the parking lot and made a private sale. All cash, no tax, no receipt.

          • tux7350@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 hours ago

            Yeah but even with gun broker it depends on the state your buying in. Most cases they will ship the gun to your local FFL, where you then still have to go through all the paperwork to get the gun released.

          • Professorozone@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            6 hours ago

            Don’t private sale happen at gun shows? And don’t you find it a little silly that you are criticizing the detail of HOW this is done while missing the bigger picture of how easy it is to get a gun in America.

            Here are me to edit that post to suit you pedantry.

  • Oxysis/Oxy@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    16 hours ago

    I hate my life and I hate this world so much, yes this shithole of a country is one of the worst but others are rapidly sliding to this too. Why couldn’t I have just been born a women and never had to deal with all of this

    • IamSparticles@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      I’m sorry this is happening. For whatever small comfort it may bring, please be assured that there are many people who don’t hate you for being who and what you are, and we are doing all we can to help.

    • missfrizzle@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 hours ago

      hugs from a fellow trans woman. <3

      this sucks. living with transphobia and dysphoria sucks. I can’t promise it’ll get better. hold your community tight, help them and let them help you. we’re all we’ve got.

    • chatokun@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      14 hours ago

      This is in no way to diminish your struggle or do any type of oppression ranking, but the GOP hates cis women too, with anti-abortion laws, putting rapists on the supreme court, aims at removing no fault divorce, the desire to make cis women baby factories who can’t vote or work, etc. Cis hyper religious rich white men are the only things they tend to like.

      • Oxysis/Oxy@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        13 hours ago

        They hate cis women less than they hate trans women, they me dead. At least cis women are allowed to live which is an improvement over what I have to deal with. At least other countries will more easily accept cis women in and allow them to exist. Being a cis woman right now isn’t easy but being a trans woman is goddamn hellish.

      • Tempus Fugit@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        16 hours ago

        Ha, you’re not wrong. I had actually forgotten about that, damn news consciousness is hard now. Yeah dumb lefty laws and they’re actually in effect, but if they declare being trans as a mental illness and bar them from owning any guns, that’s an entirely different beast. That’s a core breach of the 2nd amendment in any interpretation.

        • missfrizzle@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          11 hours ago

          watch the Court decide that the history-and-tradition framework justifies restricting guns from seditious groups, citing slave rebellion laws as precedent, while ruling that discriminating against trans people satisfies strict scrutiny. 6-3, with Alito writing for the Majority.

          we’re so fucking cooked.

          • WizardofFrobozz@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 hours ago

            It’s almost like you shouldn’t let it get to the point of them taking your guns. Almost like that’s the whole reason you have them.

  • floofloof@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    108
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    21 hours ago

    In case anyone’s in any doubt about whether there’s any factual basis for this:

    Mass shooters are not disproportionately transgender, contrary to claims

    This CNN article states it well:

    Such a move would represent a dramatic escalation of the Trump administration’s fight against the rights of transgender Americans.

    That’s it. This is just the fascists finding another way to victimize trans people, because they enjoy doing that and it keeps the morons’ attention diverted from real problems.

    And this bit is also good in the article (warning: disgusting quotes from Trump admin people):

    The goal of the potential ban, according to the Justice official, is “to ensure that mentally ill individuals suffering from gender dysphoria are unable to obtain firearms while they are unstable and unwell.”

    Because gender dysphoria is included in the American Psychiatric Association’s Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, also called the DSM, it is diagnosed as a mental disorder. (The DSM is the handbook used by health care professionals as the authoritative guide in diagnosing mental disorders.)

    But the gender incongruence – having a gender identity that’s not the one assigned at birth – isn’t what makes gender dysphoria a mental disorder. Having clinically significant dysphoria around the incongruence is what makes it a disorder.

    That’s surprisingly nuanced and well informed for an article on a mainstream news site.

    • solrize@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      38
      ·
      21 hours ago

      From what I understand, people with mental disorders (e.g. taking anti-anxiety meds) can still own guns. The threshold for being disallowed is if the person has been involuntarily institutionalized. So even if you have some kind of mental health crisis and check yourself in, that’s voluntary so it doesn’t prohibit you. It sounds hard to fit gender dysphoria into that framework.

      OTOH apparently you’re prohibited if you’ve used pot in the past year, so maybe they’ll expand that to include vaccinations.

      • floofloof@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        27
        ·
        edit-2
        20 hours ago

        The logical direction this is going is that they want to do something bad and Nazi-ish to trans people. I hope it doesn’t go that far, but they’re rounding up other people already so people need to be ready for a fight.

        • scintilla@crust.piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          17
          ·
          17 hours ago

          And it won’t stop at trans people like the “normal gays” seem to think everyone on the LGBTQ+ spectrum should be ready to flee/fight ASAP.

          • floofloof@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            13
            ·
            edit-2
            15 hours ago

            The way I look at it is: this isn’t just trans people’s battle. They just happen to have found themselves on the frontline of a war that’s coming for everyone, so we all need to fight this together. If trans people lose rights, those are rights everyone else has lost too, because they’re now a matter of the fascists’ discretion so not really rights at all. If you’re not their chosen victim today you may be tomorrow, and fascists’ victim lists have no end but grow and grow. So it’s for all of us to fight for trans rights today, because the attack on trans people is an attack on all people and we’re in this together.

  • Buffalox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    79
    ·
    22 hours ago

    It makes sense if you don’t think about it. Which apparently the DOJ never did.
    It’s all about creating enemies the ignorant bigots can stand together against.
    USA is a disgusting society.

    • andros_rex@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      61
      ·
      22 hours ago

      It’s shaping up to declare us all mentally incompetent so that they can institutionalize us. They won’t stop here.

      • bobs_monkey@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        26
        ·
        21 hours ago

        It’s a stepping stone. First they’ll target trans people, than anyone LGBTQIA+, then minorities, then anyone with liberal views, then anyone who looks weird to them. That was the purpose of that EO dipshit signed a few weeks back directing is admin to explore how to institutionalize anyone deemed mentally incompetent. All they have to do is declare “x group” is mentally ill and then they’ll round em all up. It’s fucked.

      • Buffalox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        21 hours ago

        What a nightmare, and AFAIK no country will accept trans people from USA as refugees (yet).
        I hope you have options.

        • not_that_guy05@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          17
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          21 hours ago

          I think Canada does from what they reported of asylum sellers from the US and mostly were trans.

          I hope if shit pops off they can send us care packages from the north.

          • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            19
            ·
            21 hours ago

            Last I checked (last week? Does time mean anything anymore?) canada doesn’t want poor trans refugees more than any other country. A few people have gotten in, but the vast majority of applicants are being denied asylum.

            • missfrizzle@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              11 hours ago

              we’re a good deal, if anyone wants to take us. a lot of us are reeeaaallyy good at science, math and programming. like the Jews fleeing Nazi Germany were pretty great for the countries who took them in as refugees.

                • missfrizzle@discuss.tchncs.de
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  10 hours ago

                  we’re not all network engineers! there’s also uh… rust and haskell programmers, reverse engineers, hardware engineers, category theorists and topologists, uh… biochemists and physicists probably?

                  also there’s not like, loads of trans people. that’s why we’re so easy to attack.

          • gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            12
            ·
            21 hours ago

            Source for that claim? I’m pretty sure Canada is unfortunately still very backwards on granting asylum to people who need it (like most countries in the world are), but I’d love to be wrong about that.

    • tidderuuf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      21 hours ago

      There was a convicted criminal now representative in my state that has a YouTube video out of her firing an assault weapon. She was the lead sponsor of the bill that banned assault weapons in our state. On top of that because of her past convictions it is illegal for her to be in possession of a firearm.

      It only makes sense if you don’t look at the shit show behind the curtains.