• realitista@lemmus.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    Oh absolutely, do another year or two. Russia has used pretty much everything in the tank at this point. Once they are defeated militarily, they will never come back for more.

    As counterintuitive as it seems, it will save lives in the end. Russia won’t stop until they are beaten so badly that they can’t get back up. Imagine if Germany had been stopped at the Sudetenland because all of Europe and the US came in and fought for Czechia. No WWII.

    It would actually be an affront to everyone who gave their lives defending Ukraine just to capitulate right when they are on the verge of turning the tides.

    • DeceasedPassenger@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Russia has used pretty much everything in the tank at this point.

      I’m genuinely curious if you have sources to back this, because I want it to be true, but I also feel like I’ve been hearing it for two years. Makes me feel bleak about the truth of the statement. I would love to see a light at the end of the tunnel, if you have one.

      • Valmond@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 days ago

        I’ve heard the tank running out summer 2025 since I guess late 2023.

        Check out perun and those who count tanks and more in russian storage from satellite images if you’re interested.

        Just a nitpick: they are never running out totally, they can make a handfull of tanks a month (some new, some refurbished from the last ones in a very bad condition), I have heard number around one or two a day.

        The russian economy is also similar, their wealth fund is some months from running out (this year), and Ukraine sanctions oil refineries quite heavily, but they’ll never totally run out, it’s just going to get worse and worse and worse.

        We just have to stay with Ukraine, and it’ll be a win.

        Slava Ukraine!

      • scholar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        2 days ago

        Russia had large reserves of money at the start of the war which allowed them to ride out the initial sanctions. They also massively pivoted their econony to produce military equipment because of the amount of equipment they were losing. Neither of those are sustainable for long and the only cards they have left are (greatly discounted) oil sales to China and India, and conscription (which would be incredibly unpopular) which is why they have been using North Korean soldiers.

        All of this is like a hole in Russia’s fuel tank, which would be ok if they could finish the war quickly, but their advance has been so slow that the frontlines are mere kilometers from where they were two years ago and if this doesn’t change they will run out of steam and be unable to continue.

        • realitista@lemmus.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          22
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          That and Ukraine is literally blowing up their fuel tanks and fuel lines at an unprecedented rate, greatly reducing the revenue of the country.

            • realitista@lemmus.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              15
              ·
              2 days ago

              They are saving democracy and the rule of law in all of Europe. If anyone should be in the EU and NATO it should be them. I hope to see if in my lifetime.

        • DeceasedPassenger@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 days ago

          That does make a lot of sense, I guess I ‘knew’ those things but didn’t quite put it together. Yeah I can’t imagine conscription would cause anything except some sort of internal uprising, seen plenty of stories about existing recruits clearly having zero desire to be there/realizing they’re the aggressor and not defending their homeland. Hoping their zero-steam day comes sooner rather than later. Thank you for the summary.

        • DSN9@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 days ago

          It won’t surprise me when the Russian line collapses or Putin is suddenly dead. When, not if.

      • realitista@lemmus.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        You’d need to go to many sources. But also remember that these kind of things happen “slowly at first, then all at once”. There’s no way to tell whether it will be tomorrow or in 2 years but the signs are all there, same as during the fall of the Soviet Union which took everyone by surprise though the signs were there.

        Watch some videos from covert cabal about military stockpiles. Read about Russia’s sovereign wealth fund, true inflation rate, bankrupcy rates, bank withdrawal laws and other monetary protections (money expatriation, etc), oil export restrictions, oil rationing within Russia, Putin’s theft from the private sector, and rate of printing money.

        I wish I could give you one source for all of this, but I spend probably 1-2 hours every day getting updates on the war and it comes from everywhere. Here are a couple videos to start:

        https://youtu.be/Go8Qm2X3Jx0

        https://youtu.be/_EHpGXbOrY8

        https://youtu.be/K8CcuVCDEUw

        • DeceasedPassenger@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          Thank you, I appreciate the starting point. Makes sense it would be hard to precisely predict.

          edit: I definitely prefer multiple sources anyway, no worries there.

          • realitista@lemmus.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 days ago

            I chose those videos because usually they cite their sources. But I can send you tons more if you want.

        • chloroken@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          2 days ago

          “Do you have any sources for your claim that Russia is collapsing?”

          “Well, here are some YouTube videos…”

          US liberals have less than zero geopolitical self-awareness.

          • realitista@lemmus.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            2 days ago

            I’ve read literally thousands of articles on this particular subject. I’m not going to write him a thesis paper. I chose those videos because they tend to cite their sources and can be a good jumping off point.

            • chloroken@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              1 day ago

              When asked for a source, you link to YouTube videos that “tend to cite their sources”?

              Also, can you describe what a “thesis paper” is to your understanding?

            • realitista@lemmus.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              2 days ago

              Just another .ml tankie butthurt about Russia slowly going under. TBF I’m not sure the connection between modern Russia and communism, but somehow they still shill for them, probably because they all a big troll farm for the CCP.

              • chloroken@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                1 day ago

                Hi. I’m an American. Does that surprise you?

                And, Russia isn’t slowly going under. You’re confused and easily motivated by propaganda.

    • TwinkleToes@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      35
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      Totally. Zero chance Ukraine agrees to this. They would be giving up 250k citizens and 7000 sqare miles that has hundreds of billions in resources in them. You want it Russia? Come and take it.

      While this is a historic and devastating tragedy for Ukraine, it’s helpful to remember this means Ukraine has already won the war. Russia can never do this type of invasion again, their Soviet stockpile is gone, the war chest is spent, they are a pariah for the next several decades. They are in terminal demographic decline, and they will not be able to re-arm before Putin dies to fight a war of this scale again. It’s all blackmail, corrosive misinformation and political mischief for them past this point. Their primary export market for oil and gas are dead, they have become China’s vassal, and have assembled a crappy coalition of corrupt allies who only run on bribes and are of limited diplomatic use. They lost Syria, they’ve lost Iran’s proxies Hamas and Hezbollah. They’ve lost the Black Sea Fleet. They’ve lost much of their strategic bomber fleet. Once he falls, there will be infighting, as there ALWAYS is when Russian emperors die.

      It’s kind of comforting to know Putin will die before he sets foot in Kyiv. In many ways, you can consider this the last war of the 20th century. The great, if not-quite-as-envisioned revenge project of the dead idea of the Soviet Union.

      • khannie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        3 days ago

        What a wonderful, incredibly well put together summary. I feel like we’re down to political games to maintain US support in order to bleed out either the Russian economy or desire to keep losing sons on a foolish invasion for the vanity of an old dictator.

  • NoiseColor @lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    I think people should not be so obsessed with this, of course they are not serious terms. In reality they haven’t event changed from the one that were rejected. They aren’t even terms, just capitulation. There is nothing there.

    But people are dying. Still better to have a line of discussion then not.

    • Mika@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      3 days ago

      The discussion is only continued to show Trump that russia is not serious about peace.

      russia would need to end the war fairy soon, but at this point in time they still feel like they can do more, thus negotiations are delayed and met with unserious demands – many of which Trump just didn’t understand lmao, like this whole discussion about EU troops in Ukraine after ceasefire, but russia meant “russian & chinese troops, and only if russia agrees” kind of deal, mentioning old 2022 “negotiations”.

      • NoiseColor @lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        Trump does that a lot, he gets in the news, gets “the deal”, what happens later when they start to correct him is no longer first page news and he can say they went back on the deal. And sometimes everyone just goes with it. Not sure if it’s strategy, his narcissism or stupidity/dementia.

        But like you said, Russia feel like they can do more and it seems they can. Large scale drone attacks are getting bigger and bigger and Ukrainian casualties are getting bigger and bigger. They are unable to defend, I doubt any western weapon can do that right now, even if they get a few more patriots and irises. Russia has some marginal success also on the battlefield.

        It’s not a good situation. Might be years before Russian economy starts to hurt enough for them to think of an end to this, if at all.

        • Mika@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 days ago

          Correct on threat assessment, but it’s not about drone attacks only. Ukraine is better at finding out some new solutions (action from businesses + volunteers + low rank combatants), russia is better at copying success and scaling on a system level (government vertical works faster).

          Recent success on the battlefield is them scaling anti-pilot measures. Recent success denial is collaboration between the best Ukrainian battalions.

          But I disagree on economic assessment. Point of economy getting shredded is close. I’d say something is highly likely to happen in a span of a year. It would be faster if USA did play their role and sanction oil/gas, like the thing they stated to with India (which EU did, but USA frozen for now).

          After all, russia isn’t limitless. It’s their core strategy to make themselves look like so. They had deep reserves of artillery, tanks, currency+gold, aviation, fleet - all of this is getting thinner. Like they rarely use tanks today. But you can’t do the same with money.

          • NoiseColor @lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            Mostly I agree. But on the material side, like you said, they aren’t using tanks anymore, just infantry, because that works for them. They are burning through their soldiers and their salaries, but they have a lot more. I have no way to judge it, but I’ve mostly heard they are fine for maybe two years. But after that they can do another selective mobilization that will be enough for another year and so on. We can’t rely on them running out of anything. Same with the drones, they will build more and more faster. I don’t see a way to stop that, even with Ukrainian long-range drones. You can’t stop 1000 drones/day each at another apartment building.

            Not to mention Ukraine has its own issues, not only with material, but recruiting as well. It’s pretty bleak.

            Maybe if the Americans sanctions did something. If the west gave Ukraine the good weapons and ramped up drone production and developed done fantastic anti-drone protection…

            • Mika@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              But west IS ramping up Ukrainian drone production, it’s called “Danish model” and lots of EU countries joined it (mostly those who have no aspirations in their own MIC).

              It’s not 1k drones a day and I doubt it ever will be. Currently they do 500 but that’s not daily, that’s accumulation/discharge. And Ukraine is taking down the most of them - which still means like 10-20 hit the targets per wave.

              But I mean, it’s not one-sided thing and stuff burns in russia too. Ukrainian long-range capabilities are better than ever. So many events that would sound groundbreaking in 2022 are just another Friday.

              • NoiseColor @lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 days ago

                I’m always sceptical of EU programs. Usually they start a few years later after all the documentation is finally approved, then the licenses and planning for a year and the first products come another year after. 🙄 Didn’t know if danish model, I’ll look it up.

                Regarding Russia, I think they could step up production. They could get to a point where they launch 1000 a day in a year or two. It’s possible, they are really into this war. And there is no internal descent.

                You think it’s possible to do so much damage with precision strikes, to cripple Russias drone production. They have been striking oil refineries for a while now and I didn’t see any credible resources about how much effect that actually had.

    • TwinkleToes@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Yeah, that’s fair. What I’m clumsily trying to say is actually optimistic - that if things were going better for Russia, they would be further west and there’d be no talk of peace, even on ludicrous terms.

      And in cold calculus knowing full well it prolongs the suffering of innocents - if this was a board game, the smart thing to do might be to keep fighting and letting Russian hubris bleed itself to death. It kind of makes you think North Vietnam’s strategy against the U.S. is the way to go. Keep bleeding them until they decide it’s no longer militarily possible or politically worthwhile to keep fighting. Anything less than that ensures Russia will try again the first second they’re able.