Summary

Democratic divisions intensified as Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Nancy Pelosi sharply criticized Chuck Schumer for supporting a Republican-led funding bill to avoid a government shutdown.

AOC called Schumer’s decision a “betrayal,” urging Senate Democrats to reject the legislation backed by Trump and Elon Musk. Pelosi called the bill a “devastating assault” on working families.

Schumer defended his stance, arguing a shutdown would empower Trump and Musk further.

The controversy sparked suggestions among Democrats that AOC might challenge Schumer in a primary.

  • Sovereign@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Wasn’t this a CR for the dem’s own spending bill…? So its the same bill the dems had right?

    • burgerpocalyse@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      the bill has funds for departments and agencies that dont exist anymore and it would give the administration a giant pile of free money with no strings attached

    • Dimmer@leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      This idea had some merit two years ago but it’s too late. And trump proved that you can take over a party if your tribe is popular enough.

      • hansolo@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        As someone that never trusted either party, this is the one way to get my vote.

        The Dems are 80% dusty skeletons desperate to simply stay in office. They don’t do a single thing in the interest of the people, otherwise this whole thing wouldn’t be an issue. F them and F the GOP twice as hard. They are very much also a part of how we all ended up here.

          • hansolo@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            Oh no, I’m asking apathetic voters to be so apathetic that brands no longer matter either.

              • hansolo@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                4 months ago

                I would go into the game theory and political theory of this, but I fear you wouldn’t understand that either.

                It’s OK, if it happens, things would be so beyond fucked to get us to that point that it’s less of a “third party” and more of a “survivors” scenario.

          • Allonzee@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            You’re right about the public, but that also means there is no hope and no one should care or try.

            If the people will only vote neoliberal or fascist, theres nothing to be done other than store food and water and hope you aren’t noticed until complete societal collapse. There is no possible path to a decent society when both choices are fine with the poor dying to enrich their bribers.

            I think after 24 years of holding my nose and voting Neoliberal, telling myself the lesser evil will somehow lead to salvation, and fighting for Sanders on 2 campaigns, I’m done participating. Harris was my last gasp of appealing to this cesspool’s nonexistent sense of decency. I’m not going to endorse or signify the Neoliberals new meet in the middle low next cycle, where they call for “more humane” concentration camps as compromise. My hands are dirty enough voting for the good cop in this corpo fascist good cop/bad cop routine all this time.

            George Carlin called it, the people suck so things really can’t get better. We’re a garbage people that largely despise the idea of an equitable society. Better collapse than perpetuating that. Not like people who only vote for which tribe to hurt deserve more.

      • Eldritch@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        This is TDD we’re talking about. One of the louder more prominent blue maga screechers. Who still hasn’t realized or just doesn’t care that they were made a fool of and used. That has massive dreams and whose failures are even larger than those dreams. Blasting themselves in the foot all the way down.

        TDD is third party ride or die. They know that that is where it’s at. They’re only 7% away from breaking 10% in national elections that’s so close! Only another 40 to 50% for them to win an election. That’s practically nothing! Why would anyone want to reclaim the Democratic party. Use it’s brand recognition and reputation with the average person build strength and coalition. It’s got cooties! /S

        That’s the level of logic you’ll get in any responses from them.

      • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        What a colossally terrible idea that is completely detached from where the average American is politically these days.

        Or… hear me out… It was a colossally terrible idea to not do this after the ratfucking of 2016. Or the ratfucking 0f 2020. Or the ratfucking of 2024. It was a colossally terrible idea to leave the clearly incapable managers of the Democratic party in place, and in lieu of replacing them, which doesn’t appear possible, to identify and adopt strategies that go around them.

        We’ve done orders of magnitude more damage to ourselves by continuing to support Democrats when Democrats do not support us, in anything other than meaningless performative bullshit.

        Getting off heroine is hard. Alcoholism detox can kill you. But not dealing with either of those things isn’t a solution to the problem.

        The Democrats are not your freinds. They aren’t even your allies. They are a tool preventing you from having access to power and to prevent us collectively from making the kinds of changes that can kill fascist movements in the crib by not allowing the legitimate conditions that permit grievance politics to persist.

        By occupying the space where real change, where an authentic attempt to better the lives of people would be, Democrats are a tool to prevent the addressing of the fundamental problems we have in society. Leaving these issues unaddressed give fascists legitimate grievances to co-opt into these kinds of racist and fascist movements.

  • psiderman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    The only silver lining here is the remote possibility of progressive Democrats breaking out to form their own party. At least then the US will have a legitimate opposition party.

      • unconsciousvoidling@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        I guess we will see won’t we. I’m still voting in 2026 and 2028. I’m not going to be discouraged by all the nihilists on the internet that are trying to convince me I’m powerless. Maybe I’ll find that process is finished but I’m not rolling over or giving up. Hell you could be a Russian bot trying to make us feel apathetic about voting by just vaguely going … “ you guys realize it’s all over right ? Yea keep on sucking on that copium pal! 😈”

  • WorkshopBubby@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    I have been extremely pro-democrat and it has driven me insane how the far left ONLY ever shits on democrats when they are objectively better than republicans on every single issue. Democrats generally vote in the direction of increased taxes on the rich, more access to healthcare, better safety nets, etc. while republicans are just demons who obstruct all progress for the sake of destroying the world. But after Trumps election, watching the cowardice of the dems actually fucking disgusts me. They might as well be republicans with their lack of response. Just a fucking disgrace. Fuck Cuck Schumer. I will stop defending dems. Trumps election is the official end of both parties. Neither of those parties can be allowed to survive if the US manages to survive this.

    • Saint_La_Croix_Crosse@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Democrats aren’t generally pro taxing the rich or deviating significantly on many issues since Clinton and the 90s. Yes, some of the squad said that they were pro-taxing the rich when they knew that there was no possibility of it being brought to a vote and the Democrats maintained a pretend opposition to the extreme violations of civil rights in the war on terror or ICE deportations. But after Obama, the most extreme and worst excesses of the war on terror were bipartisan, and after Biden all ICE and immigration policies were fully bipartisan (he continued the obviously facetious use of COVID as a terrible, contagious disease to deny asylum seekers, just as Trump did, after saying COVID was over, and continued deportations and putting immigrants in ICE concentration camps, when 4 years prior Democrats could understand that was fascist). That is why the left hates Democrats. Because the two-party system means the Democrats can absorb all opposition to the Republicans, while continuing all of their policies and claiming that wanting any movement to the left/away from fascism is only helping the Republicans. That we should just continue the Republican’s policies, but it is fine because Obama is going to file the paperwork correctly to send Arabs to blacksites or Biden is going to file the paperwork correctly to do ICE deportations at a greater rate than Trump [term 1] or genocide in Gaza. The Democrats are above criticism and should be allowed to do fascist immigration policy or genocide.

      • WorkshopBubby@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        Just wrong. Democrats absolutely deviate significantly. I don’t even know how to push back against this, it reads like you fed an LLM exclusively lefty influencer takes.

    • Xanza@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      It’s a great idea. And I hope she does. But his seat doesn’t expire isn’t until 2029.

    • CitricBase@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Primary Schumer, of course, but his term is up in 2028. AOC herself might be more focused on a separate race that particular year.

      • earphone843@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        I hope it’s as VP, though. I would love for her to run for president, but the country isn’t close to mature enough for that to happen.

        Waltz would be the perfect choice.

        • spacequetzal@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          “AOC is amazing, but…”

          I have never understood this rhetoric.

          She is more than qualified, has enough experience where she is out there educating her colleagues & the public about governmental processes and barriers, AND she speaks in a way that resonates with the working class AND younger generations.

          Her Among Us Twitch stream was a brilliant way to connect with her younger constituents and made her approachable.

          She does the same thing Bernie does, going out to rural America and speaking with the working class voters that feel unheard and abandoned.

          At Congress, she ain’t fucking scared to speak truth to power.

          And most important, she has demonstrated that she is impossible to buy.

          This whole rhetoric that because she’s a woman Americans won’t vote for her:

          No. Hilary is a crook and she still won the popular vote. If the electoral college wasn’t a thing, she would have been president.

          Kamala came in way too fucking late thanks to Biden. But even so, her policies were still pandering to corporations and the rich, although it is undeniable she would have been vastly superior to Trump which is why she got my vote.

          Whether America is ready for a female president or not is not the issue.

          America needs someone who will be strong against corporate interests and bring forth universal healthcare.

          • earphone843@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            It’s because a large portion of America is both sexist and racist. She should be a no brainer to win, but Trump should have been a no brainer to lose.

            • GiuseppeAndTheYeti@midwest.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              4 months ago

              I don’t understand why people are so fucking thick to not understand this. If we’re so lucky to have a fair and free election in 2028, we can’t risk global stability to prove the DNC wrong by relying on a notoriously racist and misogynistic population of voters to choose a female person of color. Despite being one of the most qualified and intelligent members of congress, an AOC ticket is doomed to fail by her demonization by mainstream media and social media manipulation and propaganda.

              • WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                4 months ago

                This kind of electability politics is exactly what gets us one feckless candidate after another. We’re too scared to support all we actually believe in, and we end up with candidates that can’t rally popular support.

                • GiuseppeAndTheYeti@midwest.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  Listen to the fucking poll results. Good god. Joe Biden was even more milquetoast than Harris and he garnered 9 million more votes. Harris is left of Biden. That’s a fact. So the only reasonable explanation is that either Harris didn’t have enough campaign time (I think a few months is plenty) or older voting Americans don’t want to vote for a woman/POC.

                  By your logic, since she’s more left leaning than Joe, she should have been able to garner more popular support but that didn’t happen. 16+ years down the road if Dems can hold the office for that long AND have shored up protections for social programs AND removed blanket immunity from the executive branch, I have absolutely no problem with AOC. But until they’re able to gain a more stable foothold in the current political climate, you’re just going prematurely kill their one shot at a presidential run. That’s all you typically get is one chance. If Trump loses in 2016, he doesn’t come back in 20 and 24.