The Supreme Court has long held that “a pardon cannot stop” courts from punishing cases of civil contempt. And while the marshals have traditionally enforced civil contempt orders, the courts have the power to deputize others to step in if they refuse to do so.

This authority is recognized in an obscure provision of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, which govern proceedings in federal trial courts. Rule 4.1 specifies how certain types of “process” — the legal term for orders that command someone to appear in court — are to be served on the party to which they are directed. The rule begins in section (a) by instructing that, as a general matter, process “must be served by a United States marshal or deputy marshal or by a person specially appointed for that purpose.”

The next section, Rule 4.1(b), is entitled, “Enforcing Orders: Committing for Civil Contempt.” It sets some geographical limits for where “[a]n order committing a person for civil contempt of a decree or injunction” may be served based on the federal vs. state nature of the underlying lawsuit. But it does not say who may enforce such an order, and it never modifies the general rule that process may be served by a marshal, deputy marshal or person specially appointed for that purpose. Thus, by its plain terms, Rule 4.1 contemplates that the court may appoint individuals other than the marshals to enforce civil contempt orders.

Archived at https://web.archive.org/web/20250317014025/https://www.democracydocket.com/opinion/if-the-marshals-go-rogue-courts-have-other-ways-to-enforce-their-orders/

  • masterofn001@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    46
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 day ago

    And when the courts go rogue they can deputize … Anyone. Like Andrew Tate, or elon.

    Monkey paw urges caution

    • theneverfox@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Fuck that. That monkey paw bullshit is how the courts were stacked in the first place… Because Democrats are too busy pretending to be the adults in the room to recognize the game has changed

      We have to use the tools we’re given, or we hand a self described King all power

      Not to mention, if this was a tool MAGA had use of, they’d use it with or without precedent

      • masterofn001@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        11 hours ago

        Being pragmatic and realistic is not all sunshine and lollipops. Sometimes it is. These days the sun hates us and the lollipops are 100%plastic.

        You already have a king. You had one when his followers declared him god king emperor. It.wasn’t defeatist to try to sway people against him by warning of what the inevitable outcomem of.his reelection. Was it? Warning is not complying

        It is warning.

        J
        F
        C

        The tools are not within the scope of the rules of the game.

        Relying on rules while the bad guys relied on the good guys adhering to decorum is why we are here.

        The institutions are being destroyed, their function and.power coalesced.

        Do not hope an abstract concept of laws and justice will bring salvation or that they are finished perverting every noble intent and.safety mechanism.

        I don’t know why you’re arguing with me.

        Seriously, read my comments.

        Tell me what I am.

        • theneverfox@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 hours ago

          I don’t think you’re on the wrong side, I think you’re advocating to hold back on using a tool that can be used, right now, to mitigate some of the most terrible shit that can be done to a group of people by a government

          But even forgetting what’s at stake… Do you think there are no checks on this power? Do you think it isn’t used already? There was a case last year where a judge ordered a custom bat mobile or something, and was unhappy he hadn’t received it yet. The local cops flew across state lines and seized one in front of the judge in line. The judge ended up balking at using this legal argument, but it was discussed, and the opinion was that the judge had no legal basis for it anyways. I don’t remember the resolution, but the judge was in danger of losing his robes over it

          There’s petty tyrants everywhere… The police are generally enablers of it to start with. Judges are still beholden to oversight, aside from the supreme court apparently

          And back to where we are… Things aren’t just going to go back to normal in two or four years. We’re over the cliff, they’re disappearing people and throwing them into what legally classifies as torture with no due process. They’re trampling over the courts and the constitution - there’s no going back from that, only forward

          This isn’t the time to tiptoe carefully around. It’s not time to come up with reasons to let them continue to act, even if there’s problems to work out later

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      Nah, that’s nonsense. Trump controls umpteen kinds of law enforcement already anyway; he doesn’t need to deputize anything.

      Your comment is just fearmongering to discourage resistance against his tyranny.

      • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        1 day ago

        Your comment is just fearmongering to discourage resistance against his tyranny.

        A lot of that going around lately, including telling people that the way they plan on resisting is “doing it wrong.”

      • masterofn001@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        11 hours ago

        No. Akshually, I keep having comments removed for urging resistance.

        It isn’t trump who would be deputizing.

        When shit hits, though, it won’t matter who is deputized.

        It’ll be us vs them.

        But, like you said, they basically control LEO. From FBI to marshalls and on down to the already rogue constitutional sherrifs.

        In the meantime, do you think certain judges having the ability to deputize literally anyone for civil matter won’t also be weaponized?

        Such as in cases of pardons, or the media, or congress, where the magats will likely lay ridiculous charges on anyone and then have the trump appointed maga judges annoint and send forth their crusaders.

        Caution is warranted. There is danger in this power. And we know who will use it.

        Edit: wanna complain about my assessment?

        Do something to stop it. Stop them. Fucking do something. Anything.

        The dems won’t. The feds won’t.

        Only those who do will.

        Fight back.

        Courts and.laws mean.nothing now.

        Understand that.
        That is reality.

        • Shiggles@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          The judges already have the power and legal precedent to do so. The trumplets have already demonstrated zero care about needing either of those things, so I’m really not seeing what you hope to achieve by not using one of the few legal avenues actual consequences could be enacted on the fascists is?

          Whatever you let them do, they will. stop complying with fascism.

          • masterofn001@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            12 hours ago

            The fuck you on?

            You’re arguing a point I didn’t even make.

            I’m not complying. I’m fucking warning. Know what to expect. Jfc . you really like to be mad at your allies.

            Anyway. Good luck.

        • TiggerYumYum@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          You aren’t the voice of reason here. Caution is no longer warranted. If you intend to continue fear mongering, just stop talking. You have a defeatist mentality and we do not need it.

          • masterofn001@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            12 hours ago

            It is a warning, an educated expectation to prepare for likely outcomes.

            If you aren’t prepared for likely futures you aren’t preparing.

            Seeing the possible uses and outcomes is not defeatist. It is awareness.

            Warning: bridge out You may drown, crash, etc

            Yep, Defeatist.

            • TiggerYumYum@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              7 hours ago

              Not a warning, not educated. Just foolishness. The other user already told you about deputizing and how you are wrong. You have the same mentality as the current Democrats in office - do not use the avenues available to you in fear they will be used against us.

              They are already being used against us.

              We are already crashing.

              You are advocating for weakness. Like that user said, stop complying with fascism and expecting a better outcome.

              Yes, defeatist.