• Tartas1995@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    116
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    23 hours ago

    Can we not make joke about Monica? She got horribly treated by the public while he is the only one who should have been punished.

    She is fighting bullying and she is pretty cool for that.

    • Canaconda@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      41
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Neither of them should have been punished? The joke is that America lost its goddamnmotherfucking mind over this. America is the joke.

      • tmyakal@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        49
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        22 hours ago

        Neither of them should’ve been punished? He was her boss, and decades older than her. He should’ve kept his pants zipped up.

        • AWistfulNihilist@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          28
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          22 hours ago

          DNC types get super cagey when you admit that Bill Clinton is a serial adulterer who was in an extreme power imbalance relationship with a woman in her 20’s.

          I’m glad the party is willingly offering him up as a sacrifice to the republicans to get keep the Epstein probe going. Every time the GOP tries a burying tactic, they truss Bill up like a suckling pig, and I’m fine with that. Dude is and was a creep.

        • Canaconda@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          30
          ·
          edit-2
          22 hours ago

          Yea it’s called consent. Not every power imbalance is automatically coercive. Society should be punished for being such prudes… they’d probably find they like it.

          • OneOrTheOtherDontAskMe@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            36
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            22 hours ago

            Not every power imbalance is coercive, but the PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES TALKING TO A 21 YEAR OLD STAFFER IS

            In case you didn’t consider that one

            Gross, dude

            • Canaconda@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              18
              arrow-down
              28
              ·
              edit-2
              22 hours ago

              She was a grown ass woman dude. This whole gen-z infantilization of 20 something year olds is ridiculous.

              Like do you seriously not understand that women also find men attractive? /s

              If she came out and said it was non consensual than colour me incorrect. Otherwise you’re just being a prude like the rest of society that did the actual harm in this situation.

              • OneOrTheOtherDontAskMe@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                21
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                21 hours ago

                I love that you think it’s a generational thing.

                And you call people who call out DRASTIC POWER DYNAMICS as prudes. Dude. Do you remember being 20-22? You know she JUST got the right to drink, right? Even if there was a personal interest in Bill Clinton sexually, the dynamic makes any sexual contact inappropriate while he’s her boss. Don’t tell me you think all those stories of 20-something secretaries sleeping with their boss were all consensual love affairs?

                • Canaconda@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  7
                  arrow-down
                  16
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  21 hours ago

                  How do you not realize that your exact attitude is what the GOP exploited at the expense of Monica?

                  If y’all grew the fuck up she’d have zipped his pants and gone on to have a normal career.

                  People have sex. It’s a thing we do. If everyone involved is a consenting adult than you don’t get a say in it.

              • yesman@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                12
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                20 hours ago

                It’s suspicious when someone has strong opinions about consent laws. But not as suspicious as someone who’d white-knight fucking Bill Clinton because, wait for it, their concern for young adults being treated with respect.

                That math doesn’t add up friend. Who do you think your fooling?

                • Canaconda@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  7
                  arrow-down
                  12
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  20 hours ago

                  lmao you sound like every time a 22 year old ever had sexual relations with a 49 year old you lost a neuron. And I don’t feel bad for calling you out as stupid cuz you are grasping way harder to paint me as a predator.

      • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        19 hours ago

        Remember Gary Hart? He had to drop out of politics because of a rumor of an affair.

        Meanwhile… Margaret Trudeau is doing blow with the Rolling Stones at Studio 52.

        • Canaconda@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          19 hours ago

          Yea cuz the majority of Canadians aren’t fucking prudes lmao. I upvoted you btw

    • buddascrayon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Yeah, it took me a second to realize this was another juvenile joke at her expense to make fun of Bill Clinton who has committed a whole series of much worse offenses you can take aim at without involving a woman who already got the sharp end of the media stick for far too long.

    • forkDestroyer@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      16 hours ago

      I think it’s alright to hold both of them accountable for infidelity in a social sense. Clinton being the more responsible as the man in the marriage, but Monica knew he was married. I can’t see a moral argument to not hold her accountable for this as well (again, socially, not legally). They were both adults. I don’t think the age difference or power dynamic lets either of them off of the hook, even though it would make the then-President comparatively more in the wrong.

      I think it’s more alright to have punished Clinton for lying (under oath, right?). Even if I don’t think it made sense to ask him about sexual relations, he still lied about it. I don’t think there’s any legal issue with what Monica did.

      I’m glad she’s speaking up against bullying nowadays.

      I didn’t follow each update on this situation while it was going on, so if you think I missed an important point that would change my mind, I’m open to considering it.

      • Tartas1995@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        15 hours ago

        You are missing the point where a man with the most powerful position on the planet, more than twice the woman’s age, made her feel special by the attention that he gave her at 22 years of age. The human brain is not fully matured until at least 25.

        Having that big of a power difference and age difference is huge.

        And you missed the point where he broke his promise to his wife and she broke no promise. You don’t know what bill told her what his deal with Hillary was. So why judge her for a crime that she didn’t commit?

        Edit: I forgot to mention, as the fucking president of a country, he has the responsibility to be a role model. He should display his good “christian” morals and not break the 10 commandments.

    • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Why should he be punished? Nothing either one of them did was illegal. It was consensual private behavior that none of us should ever have heard about.

  • ArmchairAce1944@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    18 hours ago

    You know what is incredibly miserable? When Clinton became president he was the first baby boomer president. And since then, save for Obama, all presidents were born roughly around the same time.

    Bill Clinton is almost the same age as Trump. Both were born in 1946. They were born months apart.

    • KingPorkChop@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      16 hours ago

      I hope Trump is the last Boomer President.

      It’s like the boomers last gasp to really fuck EVERYTHING up once and for all.

      • TrackinDaKraken@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        13 hours ago

        The youngest Boomer is 61. There are plenty of 61-year-olds I’d vote for, and older. For instance, I’d still vote for Bernie–just get him in office, it doesn’t matter how long he lives. Conversely, there are plenty of under-40-year-olds I would not vote for. The problem has nothing to do with age. There are a lot of 20-something MAGAs.

      • Lemminary@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        13 hours ago

        And for general shit about the worst-behaved presidents, I recommend Very Presidential with Ashley Flowers. It’s a short series of 15 episodes but gives a good idea of all the shit that happened in the White House.

        When we talk about “presidential conduct,” we usually mean dignity and leadership. We don’t usually talk about the all-night ragers, blackmail schemes, and drug-induced decisions made in very important meetings! But maybe we should talk about all of that.[…] It’s a lot wilder than anything you learned in history class, and the scariest part is, it’s all true.

        https://www.podcastrepublic.net/podcast/1525430395

      • ArmchairAce1944@discuss.online
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        18 hours ago

        BTW. Before Clinton, from Eisenhower to Bush Sr. The presidents were all WW2 veterans to some degree. Eisenhower was a general, Kennedy was a PT Boat skipper, and Reagan was in a non-combat role primarily acting in training films. Bush Sr. Was a naval aviator.

        For some reason or another, most of them were Navy guys.

    • Canaconda@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      edit-2
      22 hours ago

      For all we know Murdoch, Bloomberg, etc are on the list. Maybe that’s the angle we should be coming from here.

  • IninewCrow@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    22 hours ago

    When America had a president with a brain and had consensual extramarital sex with someone.

    Instead of a brain dead orange bean bag for a leader who committed multiple sex offenses and is linked to offenses of rape and pedophilia.

  • flamingo_pinyata@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    24 hours ago

    Such a silly scandal. Let people enjoy sex. Sure he was technically her boss but it was fully consensual and neither side regrets it.

    Compare to some recent American presidents…

    • hOrni@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      38
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      23 hours ago

      Him being her boss is the scandal part. It’s about power imbalance. There is no such thing as “consent” in this situation.

      • testfactor@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        29
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        23 hours ago

        Combine that with the fact that someone commiting adultery should be disqualifying for them becoming president.

        Look, I get that all the social norms have been completely ground to dust, but character does in fact matter. We should want a good person who refuses to cheat on their wife as a leader.

        Reducing this to just a fun fling because you like the guy is the same thing the hypocrites who support Trump and all of his scandals do.

        If he’s willing to betray his wife for a quicky from an intern, why would I trust him with anything else? For the person who’s leading the entire nation the bar should be higher.

        Also not to mention that he was 49 and she was 22. If this was anyone less “likeable” than Bill we’d all be calling him an absolute creep. He was pushing 50, and she could barely drink. And he was her boss.

      • chuckleslord@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        13 hours ago

        Partially. It was really “Republicans went digging for some dirt and he lied about fucking his secretary during a deposition, so let’s fuck him up over it”. It then became about bashing Monica cause misogyny.

    • otacon239@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      23 hours ago

      Yeah. The whole reason the Amanda Knox series happened is because Monika Lewinsky has been starting this documentary series where she tries to help victims in situations where publicity ruined their image and give them a chance to tell their story.

      What a fantastic way to turn an image around.

      • postmateDumbass@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        17 hours ago

        The definition of ‘sexual relations’ was a multi year legal debate.

        What the definition of ‘is’ was took several months.

    • kofe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      19 hours ago

      She could not give full consent given the power imbalance. She does regret her role. Please consider looking into how she has reframed her experience since the #metoo movement.

    • thagoat@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      23 hours ago

      Yeah, she got swallowed up and spit out by the whole thing. Poor naive girl then, at least she’s a strong woman now. She’s pretty inspirational.