• CMDR_Horn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    Good. I hope this is what happens.

    1. LLM algorithms can be maintained and sold to corpos to scrape their own data so they can use them for in house tools, or re-sell them to their own clients.
    2. Open Source LLMs can be made available for end users to do the same with their own data, or scrape whats available in the public domain for whatever they want so long as they don’t re-sell
    3. Altman can go fuck himself
  • killeronthecorner@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    This is basically a veiled admission that OpenAI are falling behind in the very arms race they started. Good, fuck Altman. We need less ultra-corpo tech bro bullshit in prevailing technology.

  • Rakonat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    At the end of the day the fact that openai lost their collective shit when a Chinese company used their data and model to make their own more efficient model is all the proof I need they don’t care about being fair or equitable when they get mad at people doing the exact thing they did and would aggressively oppose others using their own work to advance their own.

  • efrique@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    5 days ago

    I’m fine with this. “We can’t succeed without breaking the law” isn’t much of an argument.

    Do I think the current copyright laws around the world are fine? No, far from it.

    But why do they merit an exception to the rules that will make them billions, but the rest of us can be prosecuted in severe and dramatic fashion for much less. Try letting the RIAA know you have a song you’ve downloaded on your PC that you didn’t pay for - tell them it’s for “research and training purposes”, just like AI uses stuff it didn’t pay for - and see what I mean by severe and dramatic.

    It should not be one rule for the rich guys to get even richer and the rest of us can eat dirt.

    Figure out how to fix the laws in a way that they’re fair for everyone, including figuring out a way to compensate the people whose IP you’ve been stealing.

    Until then, deal with the same legal landscape as everyone else. Boo hoo

    • makyo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      I also think it’s really rich that at the same time they’re whining about copyright they’re trying to go private. I feel like the ‘Open’ part of OpenAI is the only thing that could possibly begin to offset their rampant theft and even then they’re not nearly open enough.

      • Tetsuo@jlai.lu
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        5 days ago

        They are not releasing anything of value in open source recently.

        Sam altman said they were on the wrong side of history about this when deepseek released.

        They are not open anymore I want that to be clear. They decided to stop releasing open source because 💵💵💵💵💵💵💵💵.

        So yeah I can have huge fines for downloading copyrighted material where I live, and they get to make money out of that same material without even releasing anything open source? Fuck no.

  • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    If giant megacorporations can benefit by ignoring copyright, us mortals should be able to as well.

    Until then, you have the public domain to train on. If you don’t want AI to talk like the 1920s, you shouldn’t have extended copyright and robbed society of a robust public domain.

    • Eugene V. Debs' Ghost@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      Either we can now have full authority to do anything we want with copyright, or the companies have to have to abide the same rules the plebs and serfs have to and only take from media a century ago, or stuff that fell through the cracks like Night of the Living Dead.

      Copyright has always been a farce and a lie for the corporations, so it’s nothing new that its “Do as I say, not as I do.”

  • Ebby@lemmy.ssba.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 days ago

    That’s a good litmus test. If asking/paying artists to train your AI destroys your business model, maybe you’re the arsehole. ;)

    • BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      Not only that, but their business model doesn’t hold up if they were required to provide their model weights for free because the material that went into it was “free”.

  • psyspoop@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    But I can’t pirate copyrighted materials to “train” my own real intelligence.

    • xor@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      you can, however, go to your local library and read any book ever written for free

      • lordkuri@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        Unless it’s deemed a “bad” one by your local klanned karenhood and removed from the library for being tOo WoKe

        • xor@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 days ago

          i almost wrote that caveat, but decided to leave it low hanging….
          as far as i know, though, that only applies to children’s books at this point…

        • xor@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 days ago

          if the library doesn’t have a book, they will order it from another library….
          every american library…

          • psyspoop@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            4 days ago

            Interlibrary Loan isn’t available everywhere (at least back when I used to work at a library ~10 years ago it wasn’t). If it is, it often has an associated fee (usually at least shipping fees, sometimes an additional service fee). I think the common exception to that is public university libraries.

            • xor@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              4 days ago

              i am guilty of hyperbole… i should’ve qualified my infinitives with “just about” and such….
              i am more sorry about my inaccuracy than anyone has ever felt sorry about anything

            • xor@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              4 days ago

              are you sure? have you actually tried? or maybe ask a librarian?
              most public libraries are part of a network of libraries… and a lot of their services aren’t immediately obvious….
              also, all libraries have computers and free internet access…
              i’d like to ask what library in particular, but you probably don’t want to dox yourself like that….

    • Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      Now you get why we were all told to hate AI. It’s a patriot act for copywrite and IP laws. We should be able too. But that isn’t where our discussions were steered was it

  • sloppychops@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    If everyone can ‘train’ themselves on copyrighted works, then I say "fair game.‘’

    Otherwise, get fucked.

  • Xanza@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    Then die. I don’t know what else to tell you.

    If your business model is predicated on breaking the law then you don’t deserve to exist.

    You can’t send people to prison for 5 years and charge them $100,000 for downloading a movie and then turn around and let big business do it for free because they need to “train their AI model” and call one of thief but not the other…