• ExtremeDullard@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    2 days ago

    Europeans can vote with their wallets and boycott nonsensical vehicles from the fascist country across the pond. They don’t have to wait for their increasingly corrupt powers that be to do the work for them you know…

    • Lembot_0004@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      70
      ·
      2 days ago

      You can vote for yourself only, not for your imbecile neighbour who “Biggy car. Wanna-wanna-wanna!”

      You can’t expect Europe to not have that contingent.

      • CosmoNova@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        35
        ·
        1 day ago

        Yup. This is the best argument for regulations because voting with your wallet isn‘t as democratic as it sounds.

      • ExtremeDullard@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Well, it’s not final. I remember a time - in Belgium I think - when a utility vehicle was defined as having no backseats for passengers. Scores of people registered Porsches and other obviously passenger cars with the backseats removed as tax-exempt minivans.

        Belgium put a stop to that and suddenly, all those backseat-less sportscars got taxed like they ought to be. Just like that, retroactively.

        The same thing can happen with your vroom-vroom-loving neighbor very quickly.

        • esa@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 day ago

          Depends on what’s actually in the trade deal.

          But yeah, hopefully we can tax the yank tanks out of Europe if we can’t ban them outright.

        • RedstoneValley@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          It was similar in Germany. I owned a pickup truck campervan a few years ago (really old ford ranger which was tiny compared to current models) and they suddenly taxed the vehicle as a commercial truck instead of an RV, this made it really expensive. Taxes are the way to go to discourage people from driving these cars.

      • Diplomjodler@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 day ago

        A few years ago, seeing a US style pickup truck in Germany was very rare. Those that were around were usually genuine work vehicles. But now you see more and more douchemobiles that clearly serve no other purpose than to boost their owners’ fragile egos.

        • trollercoaster@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          They are extremely impractical. With the typicallly sized American pick-up, You get virtually no loading space on the footprint of a decently sized van, powered by an engine that guzzles fuel like no tomorrow. Unless you absolutely need 4x4 and low overall vehicle height in combination, you’re better off with a van. If you need that combination of features to do some actual work, better get a Hilux, because that’s a seriously mass produced vehicle for which you’ll easily get spare parts and that can be repaired with metric tools. If you actually need a pick-up with dead serious off-road capabilities, get the pick-up version of the Land Rover Defender. Instead of one of those extremely large pick-ups with twin tyres on the rear axle, as you see over in the US, you can simply get a proper truck, which offers better visibility, far superior loading space to footprint ratio, and, thanks to European workplace safety regulations, more comfort, because it has mandatory air suspension in the driver’s seat.

      • Obi@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        I seriously hope people start vandalizing these things, I think that would go further than voting with their wallets.

    • TaldenNZ@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      2 days ago

      Except the endangered pedestrians aren’t the buyers… The rules are to protect the pedestrians from buyers that value their purchase above the safety of others

    • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 day ago

      When you’re voting with your wallet, people with bigger wallets have bigger votes, and those guys tend to not be on the right side of most issues.

    • Parasail2109@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 days ago

      Consumers does have a lot of power but consumers seems to be influenced a lot and not reflect “logical” and “human” in their choice.

    • BigShammy80@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      Yeah, no… that will not work. People always want the biggest dick, car, home whatever… Some people will buy them for sure.

    • Optional@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      They can, but propaganda works. A few commercials of driving those things over pristine wilderness and throw in some sex - boom Every idiot wanker has one.