An hour spent commuting is 1/16th of your daily life, and that hour is by far the biggest risk to your life every day. You should be getting triple pay to ameliorate the hazard risk it represents.

  • dandelion (she/her)@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    26 minutes ago

    it’s unpaid labor either way, it’s a bit arbitrary to say owning a car and commuting for a job isn’t time and money spent for the employer in your capacity as an employee

  • lichtmetzger@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Absolutely. I’ve been working from home for ~3 years and I’ll never go back. I have so much more time for myself (and also, no one is annoying me with smalltalk or stupid questions).

  • floopus@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    4 hours ago

    I currently travel 2 hours to and from work, making my 9 to 5 a 7 to 7. I hate it so much lmao

  • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Agreed.

    I’m lucky in several respects, being on a public transit line and only 10 minutes from work, but we have a guy on my team who drives, in his own car, 90 miles each way for our one day a week in the office. It’s dumb.

  • TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    6 hours ago

    There is a study that showed workers don’t mind commuting so long as the route is full of greenery and nature. That explains a lot because in my hometown, I was happy enough to commute in public transport and people are nice enough that you can chat with them. Then I moved to a bigger city, which is a concrete jungle. I hate the commute. And mind you, the public transport in my home town is about ten to twenty minutes more depending on the traffic, but I didn’t mind for some reason. Then, after moving to a bigger city, travelling only for one hour feels like a long trek.

    • HubertManne@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      40 minutes ago

      Oh my yes. My big nastalgia thing is when I lived in a neighborhood just outside city center and my commute was three miles. I would walk it, go four miles out of my way to bike the lakefront, or if weather was bad enough take transit. Most of the time I was getting nice exercise with the commute and I could pick up some things on my way home. I mean a lot of that is just not being in a car really and of course that outside of work most everything I needed day to day was walkable.

    • solarvector@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Something like 4 minutes of my 25 minute commute is through trees, and it still makes a big difference. I think you’re on to something.

    • frank@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      5 hours ago

      I used to have a drive to work, and it suckkkkkkkkkked. I moved, and can now cycle to work or take a nice train. I suddenly do not mind my 30 minute commute at all. I look forward to my bike ride most of the time, and I love the feeling after having done it.

      • lobut@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 hours ago

        I take a bus and then walk … half hour or so on the bus and half hour or so of walking. If I drive it’s like 35-45 minutes?

        However, I’m always more tired when I arrive there. Also, I’m not a fan of finding parking and stuff around the office.

    • I'm Hiding 🇦🇺@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Yeah honestly I don’t get the hate, maybe this is why.

      I could never live in the city. That place is dark, full of tall buildings that block out the sky and covered in trash over concrete that blocks out the ground.

      Out here in the country I have a ten minute commute and would go insane if I had to work from home. I’m quite happy to go to the office five days a week.

      I think cities are the problem, not commuting.

      • Armok_the_bunny@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 hours ago

        On top of my suspicion that your mental image of “cities” is just downtown Manhattan, which not all cities and certainly not all parts of any city are like, the fact that you mentioned having a 10 minute commute says to me that you definitely don’t live in a rural location. Simply living in a suburb does not mean you are living in the country, and there has been research done that people are much more likely to think they live in a rural location when they very much don’t if they live in a suburb of a much more dense city.

        • HubertManne@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          36 minutes ago

          Suburbs is actually which I hate the worst but ironically live in. It lacks the convenience of the city with no real significant increase in nature. It just has more lawns over the city and lacks a lot of plant diversity as the city is more likely to throw some trees and bushes and various greenery in the public space or require buildings to have it over the burbs which is just house and lawns. Problem is the burbs are a bit cheaper mostly and have some public transit that connects up with the city system.

      • Nelots@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 hours ago

        I don’t think many people would complain about a 10 minute commute. My mom has a 45 minute drive to and from work each day, and works 10 hour days (4 days a week). I would go insane.

  • notarobot@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    7 hours ago

    I mean… It can be. You just have to ask for a raise. That is what I do. If I get a job that is further away, I expect to be paid more. One of the reasons I’m sticking with my current job even though the pay is not great, is that I’m less than 10 minutes away from home. I even get to come home for lunch.

    • korazail@lemmy.myserv.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Upvoting, but also commenting to say that employees are at a disadvantage in almost all cases: a company can almost certainly absorb your loss but most people cannot absorb the loss of their income.

      Asking for a raise could get you fired (sorry, “let go”), especially if you’re in a position where there’s an eager new applicant just waiting for a position to open up, such as any service-industry job.

      Even niche skilled jobs are not immune. If your cost approaches the value your employer extracts from your labor, then you will be left jobless and you may find it hard to find a comparable position if your skill-set is tightly focused. If you’re the one COBOL programmer at your company, you are underpaid; the moment you demand your actual worth, they will figure out how to pivot that old code-base to something more modern, even if it costs millions of dollars to license and switch to a new ERP platform or similar bullshit.

      I’ve turned this WFH rant into a worker protection rant, so back on topic: Wouldn’t it be nice to just … not have to drive to a place to put your butt in a seat when your butt could be at a seat at home and do the exact same thing? I get that some jobs don’t work that way, but many (probably most) do.

      In 2020, we witnessed most jobs at company headquarters around the world being done at home and nothing exploded. Almost everything done from a cubicle can be done from home. Wouldn’t it be nice to knock down those buildings and make them green spaces instead?

  • qwestjest78@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 hours ago

    I have always felt that you should be paid for travel time for a job. If it takes 30 mins to drive to work then the company should be paying you that time.

    Look at how many bosses/CEOs bill their daily travel expenses to the company

  • visnae@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Don’t you include commute in the workday? If you have 30 min to office (1h in total), and have a 7h workday, then you only need to be in office for 6 hours. And 1h of them is probably lunch?

    If company allows work from home, then they will probably maximise the number of “work” hours, as you don’t have a commute and lunch is probably quicker.

    (This is how it should be, but yes I’m joking)

  • 1984@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    edit-2
    10 hours ago

    If you do the math, its just horrible. If you have one hour to work, its 2 hours every day just getting to and back from work, which is 10 hours per week.

    So you are spending more than an entire work day every week in traffic! Every year, you are spending 41 full working days in traffic!!

    Isnt that just insane? If you are working from home, you have 10 hours of free time every week. The value of that is insane. You could go to gym, spend time with family, learn how to cook, whatever. Its a lot of time.

    On a related note, you should get off big tech social media because that will suck up so much time you could use to improve yourself instead.

    • HubertManne@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      51 minutes ago

      Yeah in most cases if a job gave you a 25% increase for always in office and you are wfh you would be better off staying work from home unless your wage was inadequate to begin with (which unfortunately it often is).

    • Illecors@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Small tech social media is just as bad at sucking all that time up. Ask me how I know :(

      • cravl@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        5 hours ago

        At least it’s your own brain exploiting you instead of some shadowy cabal of advertising execs and astroturf campaign strategists?

  • MalReynolds@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 hours ago

    Historically unpaid commute originated before urban sprawl, car culture and a massive spike in population, it’s been grandfathered in, but it’s absolutely theft in the current environment, whether the job can be done at home or not. Posit 1 hr commute either way, that’s 10hrs a week, and should probably get hazard loading as well. When unpaid commute originated it was more like 10-15 minutes walk per day.

    One of the most significant and efficient policy changes to combat CO2 and other pollutants would be to legislate paid commuting (with just protection against discrimination for both employee and employer). Just watch every employer WFH everyone who can doing the obvious, not to mention improved quality of life, local services and being hugely popular. Expect one hell of a fight.