Voters approved sick leave mandate by 58%, but lawmakers are caving to lobbying by the state’s chamber of commerce

Being sick is a costly business for Bill Thompson, who worked in the fast-food industry in Independence, Missouri, for more than 30 years, and recently worked at Guitar Center until early July, when he was laid off as.

“As an older worker, I have health issues from working on my feet and with my hands for many years with no breaks for eight to 10 hours a day. I have done it for 38 years now, living paycheck to paycheck,” 54-year-old Thompson said, noting in Missouri, workers are not mandated breaks of any kind during work.

So when Republicans in Missouri repealed a paid sick leave mandate that the state’s voters approved by 58% after an aggressive lobbying campaign by the Missouri chamber of commerce and industry and other business industry groups, he said, “It was a literal gut punch.”

    • ORbituary@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      18
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      It’s journalism. The least they can do is be grammatically accurate. It’s half their job.

      • teft@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        6 days ago

        The least they can do be grammatically accurate.

        The irony of this sentence is great.

          • teft@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            26
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            6 days ago

            The irony is you fucking up your grammar while complaining about grammar fuck-ups. There is nothing for me to get over. I just thought it was funny.

            • GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              6 days ago

              I blame it on the editor. What, you don’t have one? Neither does the paper, apparently.

              The real answer is it’s a quote. It may be an inaccurate quote, but it’s still a quote. And people used to expect better from professionals, even professional lawmakers, like the ones in this story.

      • tane69@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        He’s literally quoting the person in the article. Your weird little nitpicky beef is with the subject of the article not the author.

          • tane69@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            15
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            6 days ago

            It’s journalism to accurately quote. What you want is for the author to editorialize about grammar.

            • jballs@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              6 days ago

              Though it would be hilarious if the author titled the article:

              ‘A literal (sic) gut punch’: Missouri workers devastated by Republican repeal of paid sick leave