As protests arise and First Amendment questions mount surrounding the immigration detention of Mahmoud Khalil, Rep. Rashida Tlaib, D-Mich., penned and circulated a letter demanding the immediate release of the recent Columbia University graduate.

It found little support among Tlaib’s colleagues in Washington, with a mere 14 Democrats signing their names on the letter condemning Khalil’s detention as an “illegal abduction.”

Rep. Adriano Espaillat, D-N.Y., who counts Khalil as one of his constituents, did not sign the letter. When contacted by The Intercept about the case, Espaillat said he expects the Trump administration — which has explicitly flouted and sought to circumscribe federal legal protections for civil liberties — to adhere to the rule of law.

The Trump administration itself has admitted the case against Khalil does not hinge on allegations that he broke the law and told a conservative news outlet that it will these proceedings as a blueprint to target other students.

      • upandup@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        I’m sure that all of the important people who would never consider us such a thing have suddenly started considering such a thing.

        Shit, Hakeem Jefferies was my District Rep, and I voted for him at least twice because of how “standup“ he was to anything else. But seeing him fall a suit with Schumer and capitulate to the worst of things that must be vocally and outright resisted at all costs Has really changed my view of progressive politics. And I thought I was way more progressive than most. I blame “establishment” Dems like Schumer for ruining his message.

        As a New Yorker, I have attended several Bernie rallies (form 2015-today) and have met him on a handful of occasions. What a great guy! But our entire democracy cannot rest on a single 80-something year-old, no matter how fucking amazing he is (and he IS great!). The entire Democratic Party should be aligned with him, but, sadly, like the rest of our entire government, nobody is aligned with anything other than self-preservation (at best) or self-enrichment (at worst). Except for a tiny few. AOC is part of that best group, and as long as I can draw breath, I will push hard for her and those of similar positions, and show up for protests against anything other than the progressiveness that this country absolutely must adopt in order to survive a larger and global order, especially as the logic global order, itself, it’s to survive.

        Democracy, freedom, and equity. Anyone who supports anything different is an enemy of everyone.

        • IndustryStandard@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 days ago

          Hakeem Jeffries was a spearhead AIPAC voice for the Gaza genocide. He is one of the most vile establishment Democrats and I am astounded anyone could deem him progressive.

          Here is a tip: if you want to find out which Democrats are standup people, look at how they voted on Gaza. If they do not care about brown people in the Middle East they also do not care about you.

          • upandup@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            6 days ago

            Not when he first ran, and not until quite a bit into his second term. In the beginning, when I voted for him, he positioned himself as a progressive Democrat and ally of AOC.

            What has happened since then, I’m really sorry about that, as far as I can be considered to blame as an individual voter.

            • IndustryStandard@lemmy.worldOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              6 days ago

              I have not followed Jeffries since the start. Might have been a case of Fetterman-itis.

              In any case, as long as you draw the red line and stop voting for him it is a-ok. Thanks for trying your best!

  • Mr_Crash_Davis@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 days ago

    If you’re a Democrat there is no political upside to coming out publicly for Khalil.

    I had read somewhere that Khalil has some diplomatic experience and possible connections to the UK. I’m wondering if the U.S. politicians know something about him that the rest of us don’t.

    • BertramDitore@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 days ago

      Staying silent on the unlawful detention and suppression of the first amendment rights of a legal permanent resident would be unforgivable. If this specific case doesn’t cause outrage and epitomize the lawlessness and cruelty of this administration, then nothing will.

      There is no political upside to staying silent on this issue. This is not the time to spread unsourced rumors about a facially law-abiding permanent resident, it’s the time to insist our government follow the laws that the rest of us are subject to. Follow due process, and if there are genuine issues with his case, deal with them within the bounds of the law. But keeping quiet and just assuming this administration will follow the law is foolish. We all need to loudly stand up for this man and his rights, otherwise no one will stand up for us when the time comes.

        • molten@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          It’s hard to empathize because a tiny sect of people may have chosen not to vote for Joe Biden? Their votes certainly wouldn’t have impacted the election. They might as well protest vote. Do you think everybody who you decide made a misguided or stupid decision deserves massive consequences? Are we so retributive now that we can’t empathize with people because they didn’t fight against the consequences correctly beforehand?

        • EndlessApollo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          6 days ago

          So this is why liberals don’t give a shit about this?

          Damn y’all really are straight evil. “Some of these people didn’t side with me politically, so fuck all of them” literally not even trying to beat the “left wing of fascism” allegations.

          First they came for the Palestinians. I didn’t speak out because some of them voted for Trump so fuck all of them. You know how the rest goes, and hopefully you’re smart enough to know that that supporting or staying silent on this is horrible for everyone, even wh-te l-berals like you

          • UsernameHere@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            6 days ago

            I gave a shit. That’s why I voted for “Genocide Joe”. Because I wanted to prevent this. But you can’t save someone from themselves.

            • EndlessApollo@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              6 days ago

              You only give a shit insofar at you can use it as a bludgeon to beat every Palestinian over the head with. Unless there some other reason why you’re so desperate to remind people “Palestinians deserve this for supporting Trump” multiple times on multiple posts?

              • UsernameHere@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                6 days ago

                I didn’t say they deserved it. That is you putting a spin on my words.

                Palestinian protestors chose to discourage voters from voting for “genocide Joe”.

                Even while so many predicted this outcome and tried to avoid it.

                • EndlessApollo@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  6 days ago

                  "Palestinian protestors chose to discourage voters from voting for “genocide Joe”. " there were a bunch who didn’t tho. Afaik most pro-palestine protestors voted for Kamala, including Palestinians. And again, even if they’re a small group (I’m pretty sure they’re the majority) why are you bringing it up in every discussion about Palestine? Do you think we were all vocally against Biden, or are you saying nobody should’ve protested the genocide in the first place, or shouldn’t have blamed it on Biden?

            • EndlessApollo@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 days ago

              It’s not even that deep down anymore cx at this point dems are literally at/right of Reagan on a ton of issues, and certainly more supportive of Israel

        • BertramDitore@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 days ago

          So because a small group of voters made a decision that you (and I) disagree with, their rights shouldn’t be protected by the law? That’s not how this is supposed to work.