Summary

A man checked out 100 books from Beachwood Library in Beachwood, Ohio, covering Jewish history, African-American history, and LGBTQ topics, and later posted social media videos showing the books with captions referencing “cleansing” libraries before burning them.

Princeton University’s Bridging Divides Initiative alerted the library about the posts.

The books were worth about $1,700. Since they are not overdue, the library will bill the man later.

Police say the matter is civil unless he fails to pay. He is now banned from returning to the library.

  • infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    11 hours ago

    Should justice be served, the irony is that this man will end up paying for 100 brand new books on civil rights and LGBT topics.

    Oh wait… Ohio? Nevermind, not holding my breath…

  • Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    12 hours ago

    This has been happening for a while… but I still remember the not too long ago when many conservatives were talking about how all libs were book burning Nazis. Never saw a lib burn a book, but they are, and doing it far more often and with far greater volume.

  • altphoto@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 hours ago

    If everyone did that tomorrow, it would be well worth it…

    Before its legal to do that, we can identify and jail assholes who hate. So I propose that this is ok, but also mark every controversial book and follow sketchy guys and gals trying to check those out.

  • Buffalox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    2 days ago

    He doesn’t want us to read those book, by the same logic, would it be OK to cut off that mans genitalia because we don’t want him to reproduce?

  • Initiateofthevoid@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    86
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    The books were worth about $1,700. Since they are not overdue, the library will bill the man later.

    Police informed CCPL that, because a contract was entered when the books were borrowed, failure to return or pay for the books would become a civil matter turned over to the city prosecutor.

    Should the man return to the Beachwood Library, he will be banned from the property.

    Shoutout to libraries. Absolute diamonds in the rough. Burn books? Whatever, people don’t return books all the time. When they’re overdue, here’s the bill, next!

    We don’t live in the age of books anymore. Shit like this is ignorant and fascist but also just symbolic. Libraries are cornerstones of a free society, but the physical paper itself isn’t nearly as important anymore. It’s hilariously replaceable.

    I want the list of books. “Banned” and “burned” books go hard as hell. Maybe even files for the m@tes to get 'em all at once. The modern age can undo all this idiot’s work with a single link.

    • TriflingToad@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      41
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      The books were worth about $1,700. Since they are not overdue, the library will bill the man later.

      honestly that’s hilarious as fuck 😂

    • frezik@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 day ago

      We don’t live in the age of books anymore.

      We don’t, but there’s problems with only relying on electronic information that can be swapped out at any time. Don’t have to burn the information when you can make it say whatever you want.

    • Bassman1805@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      2 days ago

      “Banned” and “burned” books go hard as hell

      Every library I’ve been to in the last 5 years has had a poster of “banned books” specifically to advertise them because people (especially teenagers) love that shit.

    • Case@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      I worked at an elementary school (public) in a very red state.

      I had been overhauling the library computers (I was IT) all day and had been chatting with the librarian. Cool chick, probably 10 years older than me, so late 30s. I was dating my wife at the time, so I wasn’t looking to date, but got invited out for drinks with other librarians from the district.

      After a few rounds, the topic turned to censorship, book bans, etc.

      Every single one of them, from the churchy prim and proper lady, to the more alternative types, we against banning books and discussed how to get the kids access and and encourage them to read them, without losing their jobs.

      I had to shutdown their plan to distribute cheap flash drives with banned material on them a la guerilla distribution - ie, leave it where kids would find them.

      And that is why next week Mr. Case’s cyber security BS thing was about how we don’t plug random shit we find in to computers.

      • Initiateofthevoid@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        23 hours ago

        They got the spirit! Libraries and librarians are some of the most fundamental “good” in society. They’re basically the canary in the coal mine - when they start to go, we all know there’s nothing but toxic gas in the room, and need to do something about it.

        It is a shame that there’s very few ways of going “rogue” with access to digital information that doesn’t involve tremendous security risks to the uninitiated.

        “We want to secretly give kids the ability to get whatever information they want!”

        “Great… let’s start with ‘don’t ever accept packets of digital information from unidentifiable sources’”

  • Doctor_Satan@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    2 days ago

    “Dort wo man Bücher verbrennt, verbrennt man auch am Ende Menschen.” - Heinrich Heine

    Book burners have never once been on the right side of history.

  • DancingBear@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    2 days ago

    If I were dictator I would announce a new LGBTQ and African American wing of the library and dedicate it to him, with a placard showing his payment to the library for the books he has to pay back, but he doesn’t deserve to have his name anywhere…

  • leadore@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    How is that not criminal destruction of property? Some of those books may not even be replaceable. 😠 You could also say criminal intimidation of protected minority groups by an obviously targeted political act.

    • GoodLuckToFriends@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Because the man was legally in possession of them at the time. It’s the same reason that you have to go through a tedious process to have your car reported stolen if you let someone borrow it and don’t bring it back.

    • buddascrayon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      Project Gutenberg is ensuring that all books are 100% replaceable. Don’t worry, this ignorance cock hasn’t done anything that can actually interfere with people being able to obtain and read any of the material he’s taken.

      • Pnut@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        2 days ago

        “this ignorant cock hasn’t done anything that can actually interfere…”

        He absolutely has. Stop being a pushover. In the coming weeks this will be normalised American behavior. Push back.

        • buddascrayon@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 days ago

          Hear this well, your reaction of outrage is why he’s doing it. Should he be charged for his destruction of public property? Absolutely. But should we really be putting him on a right wing soap box by making tons of posts raging about his bullshit acts of ignorance? Definitely not.

          • buddascrayon@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            Anything digital can be made into a physical copy with almost comical ease. I don’t want this mouth breathing red hat to have the satisfaction of doing more than simply creating a minor inconvenience because everything he has done can be replaced in a few days. At his expense no less.

  • Bob Robertson IX @discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    181
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    “A man”

    This person has destroyed public property. Whether or not he pays, his name should be made public. People who know him should know what kind of person he is. His employer should know who they have hired. His employer’s customers should know who they are dealing with.

    This is not normal behavior. This person is a sociopath and society needs to know who he is.

    • darkdemize@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      78
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Agreed. He didn’t have any problems posting it to social media. There’s no reason not to include his identity in the article. Even if he posted under a pseudonym, that should still be included.

    • Tedesche@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      This is not normal behavior. This person is a sociopath and society needs to know who he is.

      I wish people would stop throwing clinical terms around like this. Socio/psychopathy is a complicated psychiatric disorder with distinct behavioral and psychological markers, not a synonym for “evil.”

      Sadly, you don’t need a psychiatric disorder to engage in despicable behavior. “Normal” people are quite capable of being racist, sexist douchebags, and most racist, sexist douchebags are not mentally ill. Bigotry is a product of culture, not abnormal psychology.

    • chaosCruiser@futurology.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      2 days ago

      If you do that kind is stuff publicly on social media, you’re pretty much begging for people to make the connection between your name and those actions.