All good. It’s just an unnecessary punch against Signal. Especially journalist rely heavily on it, so I don’t know what the intention was with this title.

And where exactly do you see “Signal security failure” in the quoted text?

Tell me you are dense, without telling me you are dense. You can’t make this shit up 🤣

Came here to say this. The display has a resolution of 2880 x 1800 pixels. And this “journalist” tells me, that it looks good with a configured resolution of 1920 x 1080. Tells a lot about the quality of this review.

There are no quotes. So it is not something Trump said. It was interpreted by the author of the news story.

Have my upvote. Because my view is the same. The title included a quote, which is even marked as a quote. However, “Signal security failure” is without quotes. So the author just chose to unnecessarily blame Signal, instead of the real issue.

Can someone explain, what we see here? I am very curious to know more about it.

Fully agree. Which is why I do security the classical way for now. The only thing I cannot do myself is protection against DDoS attacks. But I either use the solution of the hoster or use KeyCDN.

It leads to a bit more configuration overhead, but at least I am able to get rid of CF :)

Thanks for helping! Unfortunately non of the products listed are feature wise comparable to Cloudflare. Still appreciate your time!