• Churbleyimyam@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    I think AI has mostly been about luring investors into pumping up share prices rather than offering something of genuine value to consumers.

    Some people are gonna lose a lot of other people’s money over it.

    • themurphy@lemmy.ml
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Definitely. Many companies have implemented AI without thinking with 3 brain cells.

      Great and useful implementation of AI exists, but it’s like 1/100 right now in products.

      • PerogiBoi@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        My old company before they laid me off laid off our entire HR and Comms teams in exchange for ChatGPT Enterprise.

        “We can just have an AI chatbot for HR and pay inquiries and ask Dall-e to create icons and other content”.

        A friend who still works there told me they’re hiring a bunch of “prompt engineers” to improve the quality of the AI outputs haha

        • themurphy@lemmy.ml
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          That’s an even worse ‘use case’ than I could imagine.

          HR should be one of the most protected fields against AI, because you actually need a human resource.

          And “prompt engineer” is so stupid. The “job” is only necessary because the AI doesn’t understand what you want to do well enough. The only productive guy you could hire would be a programmer or something, that could actually tinker with the AI.

  • Lvxferre [he/him]@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    As I mentioned in another post, about the same topic:

    Slapping the words “artificial intelligence” onto your product makes you look like those shady used cars salesmen: in the best hypothesis it’s misleading, in the worst it’s actually true but poorly done.

  • oyo@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    LLMs: using statistics to generate reasonable-sounding wrong answers from bad data.