• chosensilence@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    i’m operating under the assumption he’s guilty, yes. but i would not be surprised if he wasn’t. i do think he killed the CEO at this moment. it’s what i lean towards.

    curious though, do you have information to suggest warranted skepticism? (skepticism always being warranted)

    • mistermodal@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Of course, but it would be better if you tried to break down why you think this is the guy first. Not being glib. Why do you think it’s him? What information led you to that conclusion?

      • chosensilence@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        i’ll be honest: i have not done any research on what there is on him or what there isn’t. not as of yet. this is all a gut reaction and how i “feel” regarding what ive consumed about him and the killing. it is not something i would feel confident asserting outside of a general conversation. i truly don’t know if he did it or not.

        what it boils down to is Luigi speaks in a similar manner “his writing” demonstrates, like i can hear the same voice styles. that doesn’t mean much if you’re setting stuff up though, could be easy to match.

        • mistermodal@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          Well, that’s kind of like asking me to present both sides of it, which I can do, but not on the bus, I’ll circle back. In the meantime though, consider that is why most people believe he did it, along with leaked documents the public should not even had. Would that be at the forefront if there were solid evidence against him?