• kersploosh@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      44 minutes ago

      Quoting crime statistics based on race, like the old “13/50” trope, is often used to enforce racist notions that minority groups are inherently bad people. It’s punching down at marginalized people.

      This meme, at least as I see it, is the opposite. It’s satirizing the usual crap from the anti-feminist crowd claiming that women are inherently inferior. It’s punching up at sexist men.

  • Krudler@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    27 minutes ago

    In terms of frequency, women are significantly worse than men; men more damage per physical act of violence.

    In terms of emotional and psychological violence, women are so far ahead of the race they disappeared over the horizon.

  • BilSabab@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    56 minutes ago

    what’s unnerving is that there lots of POW reports that indicate that women showcase far more cruelty towards female POWs compared to men.

  • SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 hours ago

    >makes ragebait post for men

    >laughs at men getting ragebaited

    >pretends like ragebaiting people is progressive in any way

    • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      34 minutes ago

      Is this ragebait? I’m a man and I thought it was funny. This is the kind of thing I would say to the feminists I know.

  • betanumerus@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    4 hours ago

    People refusing to commit crimes deserve a raise.

    Those who commit crimes should be living together aways from those who do not.

      • notarobot@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 hours ago

        I have to imagine that it was also a joke. I see it as a continuation of the original joke

      • potoooooooo ☑️@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        7 hours ago

        If it helps at all, it’s not entirely true, statistically, just very slightly funny when not explained. Men are like 75% of the victims in homicides and lead in other violent crimes, if my Googling is correct. Women do lead in other categories, though, so it’s still competitive. I’m not trying to take anything away from anybody. But I also admit “borders on bad taste” is pretty much the line I walk.

    • lugal@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      73
      ·
      1 day ago

      How so? They can both do 80%. This will increase the total number of crimes to 160% but that’s a sacrifice I’m willing to pay to protect equality, the second amendment and the free world.

      • Digit@lemmy.wtf
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 hours ago

        That’s not how maths works.

        [Excuse me while I “mansplain”] But if women want to increase their violent crimes to match men’s, they need to increase by an additional 300%. This would result in a total increase of violent crimes of 60% more violent crime.

        C’mon girls! Try harder!

        Do your part to achieve equality!

        Then maybe men can cease being expected to open doors, put toilet seats down, put women and children first, die in wars, buy dinner and flowers, carry all the heavy things, fend off attackers, fix everything, [(quietly)] die younger, thrive without emotional support, be sole provider as a trad-hubby gentleman sigma-male feminist-ally bad-boy softie stoic emoting funny but only in a specific way and tall but not too tall and looking good with a six-pack without spending time working on it and whatever else in the cluster of impossible contradictions, alone.

    • Agrivar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      62
      ·
      1 day ago

      “ROPS (Roll-Over Protective Structure) and FOPS (Falling Object Protective Structure) are safety features integrated into heavy machinery to protect operators.”

      For everyone else unfamiliar with those acronyms!

    • frank@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      21 hours ago

      Could be in and out of the machine often at a site/plant that requires it outside and doesn’t bother to take it off?

      The reality is that it’s probably a photoshoot

      • Mongostein@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 hours ago

        I think the brand-newness of her clothes and hard hat, as well as full makeup, indicate that it’s a photo shoot and she is not actually an equipment operator.

      • Digit@lemmy.wtf
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Yup. Beat me to it. In and out, easiest place to keep it, still on your head.

    • Formfiller@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      You do realize everyone has to wear a hard hat on a construction site by osha safety standards right?

            • sem@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              9 hours ago

              But just because you are talking on a global forum doesn’t mean you can’t talk about your personal experience

                • sem@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  8 hours ago

                  What do you mean? We’re just describing what we see in the picture and how it compares to our lived experience.

                  Does your country have an osha or can people go to construction sites without hardhats, or do you have a regulating body but hardhats aren’t required / the rules aren’t enforced?

                  Saying OSHA is like saying Kleenex to us, we don’t even realize it is a brand name. It has become the generic term in our en_us language anyway.

        • Fizz@lemmy.nz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          23 hours ago

          They are above the rules. Unless you’re on one of the cranes with the security cameras

        • Digit@lemmy.wtf
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 hours ago

          I, for one, for sure, would be grateful for the hard hat in a ROPS event. Even a FOPS event.

        • Formfiller@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          Sure it is a redundant protection but as a longtime journey level construction worker I can tell you you still have to wear a hard hat on construction sites anywhere on site

              • SatansMaggotyCumFart@piefed.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                1 day ago

                No offense but we just moved from everyone on a construction site needs one to the construction sites in your area needs one.

                I wouldn’t have disagreed with you if you started with that.

                • Formfiller@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  10
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 day ago

                  I know cal osha requires everyone at all times needs a hard hat on a construction site. I don’t work small private residential cal osha may be more strict on bigger jobs but it is an osha requirement here so I assumed it was a federal osha policy. I know it was definitely covered in my osha 10 and OSHA 30 courses. I was also an instructor for my trade union and this is what is taught in the nationwide union curriculum and yes any heavy equipment we use we have to wear a hard hat while operating nationwide In my trade.

    • TaterTot@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      1 day ago

      I can just imagine it now. Me, in my little hard hat, on a big ol excavator, paying no mind to the ROPS/FOPS overhead, completely safe from all the debris that wants nothing more than to crack open my noggin, excavating to my hearts content!

      Oh what a day that would be!