• MountingSuspicion@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 hours ago

    There wasn’t really a Bernie-Trump pipeline in the first place. There were articles about how more Bernie primary supporters backed Clinton than Clinton primary supporters backed Obama. Additionally, many people interested in Bernie were GOP to Bernie to begin with.

    Bernie to Clinton info below is likely higher since it’s 2 months before the comparable Obama numbers. I can’t find the article I’m thinking of with a direct comparison but it had the same findings after the general iirc.

    Bernie to Clinton 85% https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/jul/12/sanders-supporters-clinton-vote-survey

    Clinton to Obama 81% https://news.gallup.com/poll/109957/obama-gains-among-former-clinton-supporters.aspx

    Similar info about the Bernie/clinton divide: https://acbc89.medium.com/more-sanders-voters-backed-clinton-than-her-own-supporters-backed-obama-c5dc37658fe5

    • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      5 hours ago

      There wasn’t really a Bernie-Trump pipeline in the first place.

      There was. Now this isn’t a massive election-deciding group, but it’s an interesting phenomenon that tells us a lot about the audience for progressive politics.

      • MountingSuspicion@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Direct quote from your link: “By every estimate, Obama-Trump—voters who had previously voted for Barack Obama but voted for Trump in 2016—vastly outnumber Sanders-to-Trump voters, accounting for about 14% of Trump’s total vote.”

        The X-Trump pipeline rhetoric is never brought up outside of sanders and does not take into account sanders took supporters from the GOP to begin with. It’s not shocking some people take inconsistent political action. What is shocking is that people are accepting the idea of there being a “pipeline”. It’s like when they write whole articles on 5 tweets and people eat it up. This is not a real concern and per your link Obama voters are more susceptible. It’s not a relevant point except that exciting candidates get a certain amount of people excited regardless of what side they are on.

        • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Sure, you’re not contradicting me.

          It’s not a relevant point except that exciting candidates get a certain amount of people excited regardless of what side they are on.

          No, it’s relevant because it means that progressive politics can mobilize current or future GOP supporters rather than just progressives.

          • frostedtrailblazer@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            39 minutes ago

            When people feel lied to is when they’re most willing change their stances as well. GOP supporters are feeling the economic promises falling short right now and will continue to feel those promises not being kept. I feel that now is the perfect time to be making inroads with GOP supporters.

            Bernie lays it out front and center for people to see who is causing their issues and people are listening.