cross-posted from: https://lemmy.zip/post/48712513

Smaller vehicles that do not need to meet the same safety requirements as existing cars could be Europe’s answer to maintaining its automotive industry.

  • elucubra@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    4 days ago

    True. What we need are the likes of the fiat 500, 600, 127, Renault 4 (the 2 CV actually would fall in Microcar territory), and such, but with updated safety design and features. Under 100Km//h, not allowed on highways, size restrictions. A middle ground between automobiles, and microcars. The only compromise that shouldn’t be made is in safety.

    • trollercoaster@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 days ago

      Those cars did have another big benefit over modern cars. They were very simple and therefore easy to service and repair yourself. A feature virtually lost in modern cars.

      • elucubra@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 days ago

        Actually all cars from that era were. I drive a 26 year old car (in great shape, well maintained) precisely because of that. OTOH, they were also noisy, underperforming, unsafe, etc. Maybe a law making cars to be mostly modular, and with openly available disgnostics and open shop manuals, could make up for that. Sadly, in this era of subscription features, that’s unlikely.

        • trollercoaster@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 days ago

          Yes, when it comes to serviceability, the automotive world peaked several decades ago. Enshittification of cars started in the mid 2000s.