• mfed1122@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    23 hours ago

    Did anyone actually watch the clip? Am I going crazy? It’s like 20% boos and 80% applause. Very misleading title IMO.

    • Zink@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      11 hours ago

      That sounds like the old Mitch Hedberg joke:

      I used to do drugs. I still do, but I used to, too.

      Maybe rephrase the headline as “Golf crowd boos Trump. They kissed his ass and gave him thundering applause most of the time, but they booed him, too.”

      • Zink@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Speak for yourself. Some of us have the patience and the sheer willpower to wait for the comments to load so that they can tell us what the article says.

        /s but also really happens, lol

  • pedz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    53
    ·
    2 days ago

    Those responsible for the booing will be found and deported to El Salvador.

    Thank you for your attention to this matter!

  • SkybreakerEngineer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    186
    ·
    2 days ago

    That came after the United States Tennis Association sent a memo to media partners requesting that they censor “disruptions or reactions” in response to Trump. “We ask all broadcasters to refrain from showcasing any disruptions or reactions in response to the President’s attendance in any capacity,” the USTA said in the memo.

    • MimicJar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      126
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      It’s funny to read yesterday’s headline, aka this quote, and then read today’s headline. Everyone is going to boo him tomorrow, please don’t talk about it. He was in fact boo’ed, let’s talk about it.

      I guess funny is the wrong word. Insanity?

        • MimicJar@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          2 days ago

          That’s good to know. It just looked so weird. I knew what I wrote was also weird, but it felt less weird.

          • MajorasTerribleFate@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            18
            ·
            edit-2
            23 hours ago

            Basically apostrophes are never used to separate a word from a normal suffix in this kind of novel or unusual construction. Pretty much just use apostrophes for contractions and (most) possessives. Example: 90s, not 90’s.

            Edit: In English, for English words. Some languages, either those normally rendered in Latin script* or transliterated into it**, make use of apostrophes either to modify an adjacent phoneme or to indicate particular sounds or a glottal stop.

            * English-like letters and punctuation

            ** Like Japanese written as if it were English, for example “Ohayo gozaimasu” which is written in hiragana as おはようございま.

            Source: Amateur with the dangerous amount of a little knowledge

            Edit2: Others point out (correctly) that referencing the 1990s as a decade would be properly written as '90s, which is still a use of an apostrophe for a contraction.

            • SLVRDRGN@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              23 hours ago

              So if you said you were a 90’s child, wouldn’t that be okay? (As you are a child of/possessed by the 90s) A nineties’ child, if you will?

              • MajorasTerribleFate@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                12 hours ago

                As bitjunkie said, if you were referring to 90s in the possessive, it would be 90s’ since it’s a plural noun already - much like parents’ mortgages or stores’ buildings.

                That said, I would probably look at the phrase “90s child” as either (1) a compound noun not needing anything to be possessive (like “ice cream”), or (2) with “90s” as an adjective modifying “child” (like “latchkey kid”).

            • Soup@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              11
              ·
              2 days ago

              And, actually, I believe it’s ‘90s! So there is one, it’s right in front.

              • MajorasTerribleFate@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                24 hours ago

                '90s is a contraction of 1990s, or whatever other century’s tenth decade is implied. So the apostrophe belongs as an example of a contraction or possessive :)

              • Zachariah@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                2 days ago

                But your apostrophe is upside down (it became a curved single-open-quote in your version). It’s supposed to be this way:

                ’90s

              • Clent@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 day ago

                Just 90s if it’s a reference to someone’s age. And the apostrophe for referencing the 90s era is optional outside of formal writing and a dash can also be used e.g.; 90s-music depending on context.

      • fluxion@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        This is what happens when you involve yourself in someone’s war against reality and rational thinking

      • burntbacon@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        64
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        I’d much rather it be a giant crowding shouting “child rapist” while throwing anything they could get their hands on at him.

        • The Quuuuuill@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          39
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          while more impactful, that takes more prep time and work. there is a magic to booing. it is uncontrollable, unstoppable, and requires no thought. it gives everyone a free space in which to enter into a grand vocalization of “we stand for what you do not.” there is no real way to boo performatively. there is too little room for interpretation within the reverberations of the crowd.

          if you do not like booing the 47th president of the united states, i recommend digging into what the problem with the act is, and consider that there’s many routes to resistance. for me, i don’t like booing the president because the president is meant to be a spectacle. it doesn’t matter if you love or hate him. it matters that you feel strongly. the argument i can hear is that you want to increase another kind of spectacle to give the people something to engage in. me, i want to remove him from all spectacle he engages in from my life and focus on community engagement. there is likely valor to both.

          but please. consider that better than throwing things at him, giving him the spectacle he thrives in, might be when he appears at an event you are at, that means you don’t care about the org that let him in in the first place anymore. get up out of your seat, and make your way to the exit, never to return again.

          • WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            That’s a good post, but it’s wasted here. On Lemmy, any actual action is always disparaged. The only acceptable response to fascism is to sit home furiously wanking about what you’d totally do if only you had an army of meat shields to protect you from the consequences.

      • fluxion@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Can’t be as bad as MAGA actively destroying everything I’ve ever held dear about this country

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Imagine if you’re the dictator of the wealthiest and most powerful nation in human history.

        A few boos from folks in the cheap seats seems like a small price to pay when you can feast on the townsfolk every night with abandon.

        • stoy@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          32
          ·
          2 days ago

          Yet basically all dictators have been harsh on even the lightest of protests, since if you allow it, the protests will grow until you can’t deal with it.

          Public protests like these are highly useful to fight against Mr. Trump.

            • stoy@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              12
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              2 days ago

              Oh yeah, keep attacking their masculinity, that is one of their biggest weakpoints.

              • Revan343@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                13
                ·
                2 days ago

                I don’t think the ‘weird’ thing was really about masculinity. Conservatives value conformity, which is why they mock expressiveness like dyed hair; they think they are the default, and so being called weird and the insult sticking because they are fucking weird really hits them where it hurts

                • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  Where it hurts is the money.

                  Nobody seemed interested in hitting reactionaries in the money. Biden kept dumping cash into the pockets of Musk, Thiel, Zuck, Bezos, and Pichai. Neither do Hochul or Newsom. Dems have the power to hit fascism where it hurts, but they’re too terrified of losing access to the Infinite Tech Sector Money Machine.

        • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          A few boos from folks in the cheap seats seems like a small price to pay when you can feast on the townsfolk every night with abandon.

          You may be assuming some executive function (delayed gratification) that is missing from the observed behaviour.

      • Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        2 days ago

        but effective

        Which of Trump’s attacks on the US have been effectively mitigated or prevented by booing? Best I can tell, he doesn’t give a single flying fuck about it.

        • MajorasTerribleFate@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          2 days ago

          Partly its about reminding his supporters and the neutrals that the people who actively dislike him really do exist. One of their talking points around election fraud/denialism is the idea that there just aren’t enough voters against Trump to justify the votes, because that’s what they’re told.

          Granted, they’re also told that people like these booers are all paid actors. Paid by whom, and how do they keep anyone from blabbing about these arrangements?

          Anyway, every person who gets splintered off from the Trump Train is a win, so push every way you can.

      • MangioneDontMiss@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        how the fuck is it effective if it literally doesn’t accomplish anything aside from a headline which doesn’t accomplishanything.

      • SanctimoniousApe@lemmings.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        The problem with it is the fact he reacts like all bullies do: he’ll have a temper-tantrum and do more despicable things even harder than before as an analog to stomping his feet in anger.

    • Ghyste@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      2 days ago

      You have heard that Donnie has the most fragile ego possible, right? Mass dissent he can directly witness is far more effective than you think.

    • ceenote@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      2 days ago

      I don’t think anyone is arguing that this is changing anything. Just that it’s funny.

      • CouldntCareBear@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 days ago

        It IS funny for sure. And to a massive narcissist it probably stings. And hopefully pulls them out of whatever reality bubble they normally reside in. They need to be reminded that they do not have public support at every opportunity.

  • Sam_Bass@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 days ago

    Could’ve been a bit more excitement to an otherwise boring sport if they had allowed them to be seen