• Rhaedas@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    24 hours ago

    If you’re still moving with traffic, why do you care that someone got in front of you? If you’re slowing so much that lots of people are getting in front at one time, then you’re the obstacle. A 3 second gap changes with speed, if it’s slow traffic that’s less than a car length. And if some asshole muscles their way into a gap unsafely, let them. You’ll still get to your destination far faster than if you hit each other or cause some road rage stupidity because of who is in front.

    Driving brings out the worst in people for no gain at all.

    • merc@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      22 hours ago

      If you’re still moving with traffic, why do you care that someone got in front of you?

      Because you no longer have a 3 second gap so you can no longer safely react to something happening in front of you.

      If you’re slowing so much that lots of people are getting in front at one time, then you’re the obstacle.

      That’s my point. If you keep trying to make a 3 second gap and it keeps being filled in, you’re going to cause a traffic problem.

      A 3 second gap changes with speed, if it’s slow traffic that’s less than a car length

      Technically, sure. If you’re driving at less than 5 km/h and people on foot are passing you, then yes, you can have a 3 second gap with less than 1 car length. But, if you’re driving at less than 5 km/h are you really driving, or are you effectively stopped in traffic?

      • 9tr6gyp3@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        22 hours ago

        If all these people are merging in front of you, then the adjacent lanes are moving a lot better, which is helpful for traffic. Less braking is the goal, and if 2 or more lanes aren’t braking as much because you left some space in front of you, then traffic should flow much better.