“The state’s case hinged on the definition of ‘weapon’ with regard to the sandwich. Since the sandwich was from the well known chain ‘Subway’ the state was arguing no reasonable human being would consider it food for human consumption, and as such, it should be classified as a weapon. In a close decision it was rule that the sandwich was indeed ‘food’ and not a weapon. So justice prevailed today protecting the defendant from further charges, but humanity is still burdened with Subway being legal to sell as food.” /s