• bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Everything has already been invented. So we get this shit to invade our lives and ruin the last little bit of anything good.

    FUCK CAPITALISM.

  • blargh513@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Tl;dr two over privileged teenage psychopaths stole a stupid idea from Meta/google that was hated by many and are going to make it worse by going all-in on the reasons people hate them.

    Let’s get these guys some money!!!

    Fuck these talentless twerps.

      • floofloof@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        edit-2
        6 hours ago

        I would. They’re making an entirely unoriginal product with an entirely unoriginal sales pitch and, presumably, an unoriginal surveillance-based business model.

        • Plebcouncilman@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          11
          ·
          6 hours ago

          Is it really unoriginal? If it is patentable then it is as original as one can get in an already very developed technological market. I’m not saying I want this out there, but that doesn’t mean that what they are doing is wholly unoriginal, especially if no one has done it before.

          • bookmeat@lemmynsfw.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            6 hours ago

            The only difference between their concept and Alexa, for example, is that you wear it on your face and tether it to a phone. Oh, I guess it also has a display you can read. Massive innovation right there.

            • Plebcouncilman@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              8
              ·
              6 hours ago

              I think the facial recognition bit of it is what makes it novel.

              Under your argument the smartphone was not an innovation, it’s just a computer you carry in your pocket. And actually computers are not an innovation they are just calculators that can make a lot more calculations at one time.

              It’s kind of disingenuous.

  • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    edit-2
    8 hours ago

    Is there anything whatsoever a privacy-minded person can do about something like this, in terms of personal protection?

    • floo@retrolemmy.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      46
      ·
      8 hours ago

      I remember when Google glass came out. I was living in New York, and almost every single establishment banned them nearly immediately. You wouldn’t be allowed in if you were wearing them, and if anyone saw you put them on, you get kicked out. No questions.

      This happened in a lot of places, as I recall.

      • turmacar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Google Glass purposefully made it obvious what they were. The newer glasses without cameras from Meta et al basically look like regular glasses if you can’t see the waveguide in the lenses.

        • floo@retrolemmy.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          5 hours ago

          If you know what you’re looking for, they’re not that difficult to spot. But, yeah, to most people, they would just appear to be regular sunglasses. This is a huge problem. It’s one thing when you’re being recorded by someone who is obviously holding a camera. It’s another one when, potentially, dozens of people around you could be recording everything all the time without anyone else, knowing it.

          Not only is a potential for abuse incredibly high, the fact that Meta ends up owning all of the content so they can harvest it for monetary gain is even worse.

          • Asidonhopo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 hours ago

            Wasnt there someone who hacked their google glasses and was getting everyone’s home addresses around him on facial recognition? I would think the risk would be fairly high to people who work with the public from these folks

      • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 hours ago

        That would be nice, but outside of major cities, I can’t see that happening.

        I may just have to start wearing a hoodie and mask everywhere. I really, really don’t like the idea of these glasses.

        • floo@retrolemmy.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          8 hours ago

          Well, you are far from alone. I imagine that a majority of people will feel this way, especially when they are more privacy invasive than Google glass ever was.

          Also, people are much more privacy focused than they were 15 years ago. I can imagine there will be significant pushback to wearing these glasses anywhere but in open, public spaces. Private establishments will likely ban them.

    • floofloof@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      6 hours ago

      “The AI listens to every conversation you have and uses that knowledge to tell you what to say … kinda like IRL Cluely,” Ardayfio told TechCrunch, referring to the startup that claims to help users “cheat” on everything from job interviews to school exams.

      “If somebody says a complex word or asks you a question, like, ‘What’s 37 to the third power?’ or something like that, then it’ll pop up on the glasses,” Ardayfio added.

      The product sounds like just another shitty AI assistant but on your face. The problem might fix itself when only 5 idiots buy them.

    • MagicShel@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      8 hours ago

      There’s a big social stigma against this. Every other version of this that has come out has failed due to the combination of expense and stigma. I suspect this is nothing to worry about.

      Very few people are going to pay hundreds of dollars to be socially isolated. Kill the market, kill the device.

  • TrackinDaKraken@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Remember how cell phones spread, and even people in poor countries with limited infrastructure?

    This will be the same or worse. No, you won’t be able to avoid being recorded by other people. This will change in the future, if it ever does, only when a large majority understand how the devices are being abused by power to control us and keep us enslaved. But, even upon that realization, if people find enough value in using the tech, they’ll put up with being enslaved if they’re still comfortable enough. It’s a balance, and power knows it. They’re working out the details as they go.

    This is what’s coming. My suggestion is don’t have kids.