Money quote:
Excel requires some skill to use (to the point where high-level Excel is a competitive sport), and AI is mostly an exercise in deskilling its users and humanity at large.
Money quote:
Excel requires some skill to use (to the point where high-level Excel is a competitive sport), and AI is mostly an exercise in deskilling its users and humanity at large.
The manual exists though.
You know it’s easier, efficient and better to have a conversation with an AI rather than read an entire manual that won’t contain the thing you need right?
You know, all the things it’s advertised to do.
Only to find the “AI” hallucinating functions that won’t work. Or won’t do the thing you were told they do.
Most times it works. When it doesn’t, it’ll still get me 90% of a solution and I can use the manual or other means to finish it. Again a much faster and better approach. I don’t need to spend hours of my time reading manuals that barely touch on the knowledge I need just to bash keys and hope for the best. Plus it’s conversational so it engages other parts of the brain as a learning tool.
These fucking people use a rubber duck for the same thing
So you prefer a “90% solution and then read the manual” to “read the manual anyway”?
Yes. Why would I need to read something that is 99% information that is not important to me or my problem.
Because you’ll learn the solution for the other problems you’ll have some day on the way.
So I’ll waste my time when I could instead get right to the heart of my problem. Have a conversation and learn more about that thing I’m implementing vs blindly skimming through manuals that have nothing to do with my problem in hopes that I’ll retain that information on 2 years when i come across the other issue. Or I could just chatgpt that problem as well