• phutatorius@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    19 days ago

    So all it takes is a little rightwing shit-stirring and the courts surrender.

    But a few hundred thousand people protesting a genocide are completely ignored.

    • FishFace@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      19 days ago

      Not really. This is why I linked the judgement. The judge writes in detail are what aspects of, and to what extent, lawful protest and unlawful actions can be relevant to such a decision, and he says it is of low weight.

      The factors to which he ascribes a high weight are that:

      1. upholding planning regulation is important
      2. the hotel deliberately took the risk that they might be breaking planning regulations
      3. he thought the council’s argument that it was a breach of planning rules was strong (although this is a judgement for interim relief, not the final judgement).

      Having read it, it still sounds insane. The risk if interim relief were not granted but the changes at the hotel turn out to require planning permission with respect to those three factors are that the breach goes on for a bit longer. The risk if it were granted but the changes turn out to be lawful is that over a hundred people are turfed out, the government has to find a yet-more expensive way of accommodating them, something which may be impossible if the relevant factors of this case become precedent in others.