As the title suggests, over the last couple of days there’s been an influx of doomer comments over the SKG petition. While it’s fine to disagree, I’m finding it suspicious that there weren’t comments like this posted a week or 2 ago

  • abbotsbury@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 minutes ago

    No, there was definitely some criticism before. Prior to this month, it wouldn’t be unusual to hear people complain about how it would destroy the live service market and was therefore Bad Actually for games and game preservation

    The topic getting much more mainstream just brought all those people with.

  • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Maybe not specifically this comm, but I had been sporadically arguing with people on various places on lemmy about SKG before Ross even droppes his 'SKG is probably dead, video that (re)ignited this whole thing.

    A whole, whole lot of people I talked to basically had the same talking points Thor initially did, a lot of them were dedicated to various facts that were simply wrong, rhetoric that was either bipolar/hypocritical, or just ultimately nihlist (nothing can be done).

    I was actually very relieved, initially, when Ross made above mentioned video, simply so I would no longer have to keep explaining all the various intricacies… Ross had addresed all this stuff before, but you’d have to watch about 2 or 3 hours of videos to truly get it, in all its detail.

    The ‘SKG is probably dead’ video did a good job of doing both a broad overview, as well as going into detail with the more common, in-depth misunderstandings… which were pretty much all popularized by Thor.

    • slaneesh_is_right@lemmy.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Yeah bit he worked at blizzard, so he knows way more about assaulting co workers than you. Wait what are we talking about?

  • alessandro@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    14 hours ago

    One year ago, right at the beginning of the petition, PirateSoftware came out misreading the initiative by suggesting the idea the petition was about forcing indie developer to host their server, at their expense, forever and other stupid idea on this line. A fabricated these narrative to act as the typical popular youtubers that say endlessly: “this is st0pid, they are st0pid”. The fabricated narrative confused other popular YouTubers with mixed feelings; and there was very little support. This assured PirateSoftware the first place on the youtube rankings when you search for “stop killing games”, plus had lot of kids brainwashed into thinking " this is st0pid". This kind of criticism never went away completely, the were partially silenced by the very recent roaring as people understood correctly what it was actually about. As SKG keep hitting its milestone the angered roar did lowered, so now you can ear again the “this is st0pid” team

    • Luffy@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      21
      ·
      14 hours ago

      You can swear on the Internet. The same way I can say that I want to spray pepper spray on your private parts. And you can then cry about me because I said the big bad stupid word, so I have to una1iv3 myself.

  • ZeroHora@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Another bot paranoia…

    Not every people that disagree with the norm is a bot. The petition got more popular recently, even some news outlet that has nothing to do with games started talking about it in my country in the last week, so has a high chance of a bunch of people that didn’t read much about started to comment with their “protect the billionaires” reaction.

  • douglasg14b@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    56
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    20 hours ago

    Welcome to the age of bots.

    Enjoy your perpetual unavoidable and even undetectable bias and opinion influencing astroturfing.

    Paid for by whoever doesn’t want the things that you want, to influence the people around you to bite at each other’s throats and work against their own interests.

  • ZeroOne@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Well certain EU politicians support SKG, so yeah it’s making a lot of corpos uncomfy

  • Red_October@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    17 hours ago

    I think suspicious is the wrong word. Suspicious seems to suggest doubt or a lack of certainty, but the criticism is pretty predictable. Industry forces could afford to ignore it when it looked impossible to get the signatures, but now that the signatures are in the bag they’re having to take a different tactic.

    SOME of the criticism is certainly genuine and exactly what it appears to be at face value, but it was inevitable that those doubts would be artificially boosted now.

  • Supervisor194@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    62
    ·
    24 hours ago

    Because it’s about to affect big money so they sic their bots on it to shape public opinion and stomp it, like everything else.

  • who@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    81
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    I don’t find the absence of criticism suspicious. The petition makes sense. It aims to solve a problem that affects many individuals and a significant part of human culture.

    What I do find suspicious is the sudden emergence of criticism now that it looks like it might succeed. I smell astroturfing and media manipulation.

    • the16bitgamer@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 hours ago

      I don’t find it suspicious. Bring attention to it and it’ll get more votes. Ignore it and it’ll go away.

      Now that it’s passed multiple thresholds and is gained a lot of support. They will not try and stop it.

    • duchess@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      As the petition got more successful it became a bigger topic on here. Bigger topics draw more opinions.

  • Mister Neon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    153
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    I haven’t seen anyone here against it.

    Ross got hit with some anonymous legal complaint so I wouldn’t be surprised with astroturfing.

    I’m also an American so I can’t help.

    • dinckel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      13 hours ago

      The entire complaint was based on nothing too. They claimed he’s orchestrating some crazy financial scheme, and getting paid 6 digits from it, when he’s not only doing it for free, but can’t even participate in the initiative to begin with

  • stoly@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    106
    ·
    1 day ago

    Are people criticizing it? There is a certain critical mass that when something becomes popular enough a subset of the population will automatically oppose it.

    • hoshikarakitaridia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      68
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      There’s also a threshold where Industry Groups will start astroturfing. Especially when it comes to worker’s rights or consumer’s rights.

        • Dultas@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          1 day ago

          It’s a fine line because if you do it too early you’ll just add more attention to it. They probably predicted it would stall out.

  • paraphrand@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    19 hours ago

    I’m not against the goal. But I have voiced that I don’t think this route/configuration of leadership will work.

    I only heard about it once people on Lemmy started talking shit about this pirate guy. I hadn’t heard about him either. So it came on my radar as drama. And I ended up having a rough time sharing my point of view. People are really emotional about this intuitive. They take any criticism as an attack that could harm progress on signatures.

    In the end the drama with this pirate dork ended up actually bringing positive attention that helped an otherwise flagging initiative for signatures.

    I hope the initiative causes positive change.

    • Pheta@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      18 hours ago

      But I have voiced that I don’t think this route/configuration of leadership will work.

      Could you elaborate on this, beyond the one sentence? The rest of your comment makes it clear that you weren’t aware, and still aren’t about much of what was going on with SKG. Given that you don’t have a clear understanding of what the timeline of SKG was, that does leave room for doubt that you understand the initiative. I would like to give you the benefit of the doubt, so please explain what you meant.

      I hope the initiative causes positive change.

      We all do.

      • paraphrand@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        10 hours ago

        I don’t jive with the guy heading it up. With the way he communicates the message, with the style of video he makes, or with the approach of a petition. I think all of that combined is a weight on the effort.

        That’s where I’ll leave it though. Cuz I’m just one guy. No need to throw a bunch of downvotes on this. My voice won’t hurt the cause.

        • descartador@lemmy.eco.br
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          6 hours ago

          Sorry, but there is no one else. Are you going to give your savings away for this? No one would, but he’s doing it.

          He has an online following that expect his style of video, but regardless of that, this is the same thing that made piratesoftware hate in the projext blindly, he didn’t like the look of the guy and the aesthetics.

          Really? Grow up, why do you care how the video looks? Have you ever tried writing script, setting up a studio, recording, editing, publishing and designing a video? I do this professionally and it can takes weeks or months to have something that looks moderately acceptable. Why do you care about the aesthetics? I don’t get it

              • paraphrand@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                4 hours ago

                You’re calling me childish, and making assumptions about what I have and have not done in video production and related fields. And I’m being downvoted for sharing my opinion after being asked for it by the OP and someone replying.

                It just doesn’t feel like “just a conversation.”

  • mriswith@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    20 hours ago

    Not at all.

    More attention means more people see it, so even if the percentage of complainers haven’t changed, there are more people who know.

    On top of that, there was criticism before. There’s that streamer who was mocked relentlessly in comments and some defending him, there were articles about game developer lobby groups complaining that were posted here, etc.

  • Korkki@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Does anyone else find it suspicious there wasn’t any criticism on here about Stop Killing Games until after it hit 1.4M signatures?

    Nobody here disagrees with any point of the petition. I signed it. Even if gaming companies were rushing to send shills to raid discussions they would have done it months ago and last places they would go astroturff for is this Kazakhstani anti-whaling forum. Especially when their target now is the Eu bureaucracy and MEPs. Where I might say they have not a bad chance of succeeding.

            • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              53 minutes ago

              I’m pretty sure it’s in the US. I’m in Utah (pretty far western US) and ping times are like 10-15ms, which is consistent w/ a west coast server. I have a VPS in Germany, and pings are more like 100-150ms.

              I’m not exactly sure how pings work w/ cloudflare, so maybe it’s hosted somewhere else, but I would imagine they’d get a cloudflare host near their VPS to minimize latency.