• glitchdx@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    6 hours ago

    i know it’s not the important part of your comment, but I must point out that indies will be fine because indies do not have publishing deals. If your studio is beholden to a publisher, then you are by definition not independent.

    • MurrayL@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      The definition of indie is always contentious, but there are definitely studios out there who are independent (as in not owned by a larger company) but work with a publisher for funding, marketing, and other support.

      Even beyond that bit of semantics, many indies rely on funding from investors of one sort or another, be that angel investors, startup funds, or even just small business loans.

      Many of those investors have lost their appetite for games, making it extremely difficult to pay the bills unless you’ve already got a sizeable cash reserve to cover costs.

      • Katana314@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        “I’m sick of investing in video games. They’re always so unreliable.”
        “You literally only ever invested in two companies.”