Mark Rober just set up one of the most interesting self-driving tests of 2025, and he did it by imitating Looney Tunes. The former NASA engineer and current YouTube mad scientist recreated the classic gag where Wile E. Coyote paints a tunnel onto a wall to fool the Road Runner.

Only this time, the test subject wasn’t a cartoon bird… it was a self-driving Tesla Model Y.

The result? A full-speed, 40 MPH impact straight into the wall. Watch the video and tell us what you think!

  • Glitterbomb@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    You realize Mark Robers target audience is like 8 years old, right? He also references looney tunes and wile e coyote a couple dozen times, including in this thumbnail you’re losing your mind over. The thumbnail fits the theme very well if you ask me.

    This video isn’t a rigorous scientific test. This is a children’s video designed to get them interested in the scientific method. Get over yourself.

      • MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 days ago

        Why would children be interested in anything?

        Have you never seen educational content before that wraps up potentially boring teachings in an exciting narrative?

        • Buffalox@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          Since most grownups aren’t interested in safety, I just thought it would be even less for kids.
          All sales promotion stats show that car buyers basically don’t care about safety features. Almost all significant safety features are there because of regulation.

          Edit:
          I can only laugh at the downvoters, you know nothing. It’s been a well established fact that safety doesn’t sell cars since the 50’s.

          • zenpocalypse@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 days ago

            Seems like a strange application of stats when, as you say, the regulated safety features - the important ones - need not come into a decision-making process and advertising them would be a waste of time.