

I agree - but that’s user error, not a bad tool
I agree - but that’s user error, not a bad tool
Hammers are unreliable.
You can hit your thumb if you use the tool wrong, and it can break, doing damage, if e.g. it is not stored properly. When you use a hammer, you accept these risks, and can choose to take steps to mitigate them by storing it properly, taking care when using it and checking it’s not loose before using it.
In the same regard, if you use LLMs for what they’re good at, and verify their outputs, they can be useful tools.
“LLMs pointless because I can write a shopping list myself” is like saying “hammers are pointless because I can just use this plank instead”. Sure, you can do that, but there’s other scenarios where a hammer would be kinda handy.
Hitler used the burning of the Reichstag as an excuse to clamp down on political dissidence and consolidate his power. It’s still not clear whether it was intentionally caused by the Nazis or just a convenient opportunity for them.
They’re both the respective heads of state, and they’re both not members of the legislative branches.
So yeah, in this context they are effectively the same.
I wasn’t claiming that he hasn’t been the president of France; I did, in fact, notice.
I said that’s not what the president of France does.
It’s like getting mad at the King of England for Canadian laws, that’s just not his responsibility, even if he is head of state.
There’s loads of issues with Macron, but I don’t see how he’s responsible for any of the above
The president doesn’t legislate, and he doesn’t command the police, he’s the executive head of state.
Actually, the Finns already spend 2.4% of their GDP on defense, making them one of the highest defense spenders in Europe (relative to GDP). And they’re famously very well prepared for wartime scenarios.
Turns out sharing a border with Russia makes military spending look very appealing.
This has to be the most American take of the week
Car-brain plus assuming the french think about them, that’s some top tier copium
I broadly agree, but I think there’s a bit of a “correlation is not causation” effect at play, too
I would expect people who are very career-focused would prioritise socialising less, and also be more willing to do a long commute for a job they are highly invested in. But the reduced socialising wouldn’t necessarily be caused by the commuting (not entirely, at least).