Oh, not true anymore:
https://docs.clamav.net/manual/Usage/Scanning.html#on-access-scanning
Just to make this clear R290 is also known as propane.
So, I wonder what happens if we ad a ln option for every single one of those tasks in the UI? O right!
msvc.exe is calling!
I read quiet a lot about us history. But our viewpoints are different on it.
Also, your political system enables this asshole. He uses your own legislative and political system against you.
You have to make sure to fix this ASAP. I know own it is hard, I know in your the winner takes it all system, and how changes to the constitutions are done that this is hard. Very hard. But what are your options? Give up?
Assume Trump dies on a overdose of lead next week, the next asshole can use the same system to try again.
Just start now to give out an idea to anybody that reaches voting age. Don’t bother about the older ones.
It will take time, but it does not overload your system
Not to long ago we killed millions and wanted world domination. We changed our laws so this does not happen again Because law can be changed
So? The idea itself is not inherently bad. If I want to vote in Germany I go to the local polling station, show my ID (proof if citizenship) and hand over my voting documents (so I can only vote once, also the volunteers will mark me on a list) and I vote. And no, I don’t have to register to vote.
Your problem is that your common way of identifying is your damn drivers license and not an ID card like in nearly every other country.
Not defending this big, orange, walking, talking and shaking with his little hands, asshole. Just saying, not all of your problems are caused by him. Many of them are inherent to your political system.
Mhm, would be an interesting scientific experiment
In all seriousness: I am fighting against neonazis here in Germany since >20 years. Physically and rhetorically.
Do not, I repeat do not set teslas on fire!
But new point could be a good idea. I mean, those big canvases scream for some spray paint.
As a poly person: no, it is not a “affiar-tolerant monogamy”. That is an open relationship.
Polyamorous partnerships are far more committed. Also, sex is not always a part of it.
Of course there is the concept of a primary partner, but there are lot of poly folks that thislike this idea.
But what all of those relationships have in common: there is no case where only one partner is poly. All is about communication and consent.
And to the core topic: There is this thing like a polycule. A network of people with somehow connected relationships. Breakups in those structures are often consensual and no big fuzz. But if it gets dirty, at least in my experience, the offending member of the polycoule gets shown the door. And most of the times, those are the new ones. People that think the could convince their partner to get monogamous because they are the only one that is needed.
Sorry for the long post, you hit a nerve there ;)