The election yes, but there are disagreements about the legitimacy of the results. Apparently the voting machines might have been manipulated.

https://m.economictimes.com/news/international/us/kamala-harris-election-result-trumps-victory-under-scrutiny-as-lawsuit-filed-heres-what-could-happen-next/articleshow/121760834.cms

So if somali pirates would just take the ship and send the crew back home it would all be good?

You’re having an interesting opinion here.

You do think that women should be able to marry more than one person? So above story wouldn’t be a problem for you if one of the women had a husband and a wife?

From my personal experience a lot of muslim women do not consent to their husband havinv more than one wife (in Islam the woman has to consent), so it’s something that happens only when the women agree to it.

Self aware zionists would most likely hate themselves. They are so lucky to lack that self awareness.

I think as long as the colonizers maintain an economically superior position, and keep the political power, there can be no real integration.

The problem is that even 27% couldn’t stop the colonizers from further destroying the nature.

Even if all Maori voted for them, they only would have 19%. That means they would still not be able to have political power.

The system is rigged, giving the huge number of colonizers an advantage over the native population. Australia has a similar problem.

So should the supermarket check the ID before selling alcohol, or is it the parent’s responsability too?

Jokes aside, I think the problem is that most parents are not technically capable of configuring a router at home, and even if some did, as most don’t kids would just go to those homes or use those phones to watch it, I guess?

Like I get it, but this will never work, unless you force every parent to visit classes about phone and router configuration.

Why wouldn’t they then measure testosterone levels instead? What if a trans man fights a woman, because he has a vagina? Is that a fair fight?

What you’re implying is, that because the left has the choice between

• we cut the poor and minorities leg off, and maybe in 4 years people will see how bad it was and will vote more progressive
• we cut one of the poor and minorities finger off, and then in 4 years we’ll choose again, but probably it’ll be between a leg and a finger again.

And chooses the option where improvement can happen instead of feeding into the vicious cycle of the lesser evil, it’s the left that is to fault for fascists coming into power? You’re delusional.

There’s a reason why center parties are called the stepping-stone of fascism. You’d really do yourself a big favor by reflecting your views.

That’s why you need some president that introduces something like a requirement for kids to visit a school, abolishing religious private schools (or forcing them to comply with a national standard for education).

Stupid people will vote for stupid shit, and home schooling or ultra-religious schools just lead to more stupid people. Knowledge is power for the people.

The problem is, that this is what basically happened for as long as I can remember. People vote for a democrat, they don’t really succeed in bringing substential improvements because they have to keep the billionaires happy, and at some point people vote republican again, which then proceed to fuck up everything even harder.

It’s a downward spiral, and in my opinion the only way of breaking out of it is to break it. So either the democrats choose somebody that is likely to improve the quality of life for the broad population, or the republicans win again and break the country completely.

Enabling this spiral by voting for the “lesser evil” will just lead to it going on forever.

The fact that you’re always deflecting off yourself shows me everything I need to know about you.

You know that you’d have a choice, and you know that it’s objectively wrong to harm animals for no reason. And all the pointing to cases where it might be justified does not change that fact.

It’s funny how you come with a small valid exception, when the majority of humanity lives in big cities where everything is accessible.

Of course, Inuit people in North Canada will eat seals, but hiding yourself behind them just shows how unaware you’re of your own privilege and also responsibility.

Tofu really depends on which consistency you buy. In stores like H-mart or other asian stores (USA), you can usually buy from very soft (silken tofu, consistency very soft) to very firm (consistency closer to a block of fresh cheese)

In Europe it can even go to more firm consistencies, something you can also reach yourself if you press/compress it for a few hours (google tofu press, probably also works if you improvise it).

If you’re searching something more meat like, I’d recommend trying soy chunks from a local indoan store (or the internet), they are also very convenient because they come dry and you can store them for ages until you soak and cook them. Just make sure to add spices when cooking tofu and/or soy chunks, because both don’t really have a taste by themselves. I usually use Soy sauce, sesame oil, garlic powder, salt, pepper and various types of chillies.

Ok, so so you’re saying me that somewhere 200g of meat is cheaper than 200g of tofu? Because an average meal is pretty much vegan except for the protein, if you cook with oil instead of butter (which is also cheaper).

But yeah, no matter what I say, you’ll claim it’s wrong, mainly because you’re not really interested in anything but spreading your words. Which is fine, have a nice day.

You think men on the internet have experience getting something wet?

I think when you’re calling vegans “religious” it’s you using that as a slur, despite acknowledging that it’s objectively true, which you probably wouldn’t say about religions?

And I agree that there are many more problems, but it’s easy to tackle more than one problem at a time, and considering that meat production is responsible for around 15-20% of all carbon emissions, and is a waste of calories (you feed the plants to the animals to get 1/10th at most back), it’s an easy way to also try to help out humans by combatting climate change and world hunger.

I’d also add that the term “carnist” is just a factual description. It’s like calling a female presenting person woman.

What I read is that you believe being vegan is being privileged (which to an extend is true, because usually it’s the more educated population that also tends to be vegan).

But the reality is that vegan food is cheaper for the same nutrients. And that despite meat and milk being havily subsidized.

I have no idea what vegan teacher youre talking about, and in my experience non-vegs feel bad just by hearing that I do actively go out of my way to not hurt innocent sentient beings.

But yes, of course you’ll feel like you’re doing the right thing, when you actually stop doing the wrong thing. Nothing wrong with that.

Also, the only reason the militant vegans make people so angry is, that deep down they know it’s true. Change my mind.