I’ll leave you to your thoughts. Have a good day

Interesting. Yes we are reducing the not knowable to knowable, which is moot.

Interesting

I’m not saying there is one. It’s just a thought experiment

Yes exactly

I understand we would. I just left a shower thought on the possibility that an entity, if exists, called God would. Not trying to be pedantic here, just an amusing thought. 🙂

Ah. I got baited 😆

💯

You mean it doesn’t exist ? Perhaps I should be clear since I wrote just two lines.

If you take top comments on any (even non political) popular posts, there will be someone posting an intentionally controversial, yet unrelated, comment. I guess it boosts engagement of the post, or the commenter gets karma (or whatever fake points) or just some lunatics doing it for the kick of it. The problem is most people reacting to such comments doesn’t realise they were just baited into it.

Hence the thought in the shower 🚿

Unpopular opinion - yes but not exactly

Searching the web is/was always like making a prompt. The difference before the current AI hype was that it was a different kind of algorithm, but still an algorithm tailored to make profit for the company. Or in other words, it was never in the user’s control on what information is received from the web. That is the nature of the web itself until, to some extent, we hopefully reach a dystopian decentralised non profit web. And hey we might even get there because you are reading this on Lemmy.

So to not die, we just need to stop breathing !

To be clear, OP is not questioning the validity either. You are, and that’s a separate discussion.

If I tell you “playing with fire is risky”, and then you bring up an old book to me where is it written “playing with fire is risky”, the discussion is not about whether I told you that from the book. It is not about whether my advice is valid or the book is valid. The discussion is just that people who had read the book should have already known “playing with fire is risky”.

I’m not religious. But your point doesn’t make sense. Being around X number of years doesn’t contradict with the possibility of one idea being a part of the other. I guess that’s what the user is trying to say, but I’m not sure how factual it is.

I think you meant - Me Xbox is spying on my instead.

Man, this is sacred. This should be the first line in Intro to Internet.

This is what I’m talking about, you can’t even acknowledge about the terror attack by Pakistan.

Lol I didn’t cite anything. It has been talked about by multiple media outlets already but since you can’t (won’t) find it, here is the sweaty defence minister’s original interview.

I know that this wont fix your illusionary denial of the facts and you’ll find some way to twist things to force yourself into your belief system. So I’ll rest my response here. Only you can save yourself from yourself my friend.

Ya you are reading lemmy from a city that got bombed, very believable narrative.

Regardless, I agree with the point that civilians should never be attacked, no matter what side they are on, be it India or Pakistan.

Having said that. When the defence minister of Pakistan has openly accepted they harbour terrorists (go watch it on YouTube, an easy find) and the terrorists attack civilian tourists, shoots husbands in front of their wife and children, I’m sure your mouth won’t open to talk about it.

Sad. Not the comment, you. Hopefully it has satisfied your appetite for sending misinformation.

They are “squabbling” about terrorists killing of innocent civilians. But you don’t need to worry about it, nobody you know is in danger. Please continue with your ingest-digest-excrete-repeat cycle.

Exactly. These type of comments only come from an immature POV that how they use Linux is how everyone would use Linux.