

hadn’t been held back by lazy MS et al.
MS is not lazy but working hard to maintain their lead.
hadn’t been held back by lazy MS et al.
MS is not lazy but working hard to maintain their lead.
It’s two quotes. Miners don’t throw coal into furnaces.
My liberal friends were saying, ‘You can’t expect them to be able to do that,’” Biden told his New Hampshire audience. “Anybody who can go down 300 to 3,000 feet in a mine, sure in hell can learn to program as well, but we don’t think of it that way,” he said.
“Gimme a break! Anybody who can throw coal into a furnace can learn how to program for God’s sake.”
However, the only strategically significant rival we have that utilizes those shopping lanes are Russia, whom the administration wants to buddy up too.
If that doesn’t play out, Putin will be dropped like Saddam.
Better than being a hopeless doomer about everything.
How can any change happen if there is only a limited willingness to perveive reality and analyze it?
They’re clearly referring to when it became easily accessible to the masses.
When have you been to the moon?
Whatever is the next step, some things need scale. Google has their own AI chip. I think there are also specialized storage chips. Gates has a company for new nuclear reactors.
But that’s the next step. First somebody has to catch up and establish cloud services in an environment that is as skeptical as the comments in this thread, with less money to burn and a smaller pool of developers.
The magical advantage of hyperscaler is not price but that new business ideas can be tried much faster with no need for hardware investments. They can keep running when a moment of social media attention brings a huge amount of new customers. An outage doesn’t matter if everybody else is also down.
Of course the hyperscaler knows which apps are cash cows, as does the Android team, as do the credit card companies. Europe is not prepared for that future. As the CEO says, we can do what is left, supply chain optimizations, unless there is a fundamental change.
Who is going to finance it? Google and Microsoft barely could break into AWS market. There is a huge portfolio of services to write. 450 million is not much if the others have 4 billion customers.
It’s network effects and the winner takes it all. Google and AWS are only in rhe market because they have a ridiculous amount of money to burn and the customer relations to pry away their share of the market.
Of course it is strategically crucial. That’s why Mictosoft and Google got involved. The EU is very late to the game. They must have noticed that China has built a competitor but they didn’t start moving. Europe must invest more than Oracle, who also have money and customers, but not enough.
The problem is that China has one billion customers. If Europe and USA split further it could happen that each company could be too small for the next level.
I would’t call them cloud data centers. Those existing European data centers can’t be what the CEO is talking about when he is speaking of development.
Competition to cloud services like AWS lambda and such doesn’t exist. That’s what has to be developed and established in the market.
Technically he is not wrong. Where should the scale come from? Europe also doesn’t have the software companies that would use the data centers.
The big question is why Europe was asleep while the US were building their dominating position?
Then think about why it wasn’t a huge issue directly after the election.
Syria was conquered by anti-Hamas forces. Others are also playing chess.
Only if the summary is included in the training data.
After all, it’d be much easier to press on a button that’d kill 10 000 people living 10 000 km away from you than to stab one person to death.
That could be the result of our training. After all, people die for our way of life and we have to cope.
They have a base in Greenland if they want to fly to Greenland. If anything this shows that the Greenland story was just there to flood the zone.
Why does the USA need those bases, especially since they said that Europe should defend itself?
I know the UK banned women’s orgasms
Why? To prevent British women from having expectations?
Kontrollierte Opposition. Eine Nazipartei bekommt nicht die Mehrheit oder wird nach Wahlerfolg und vor konstituierender Sitzung verboten. Eine nazifreie Partei könnte dagegen gewinnen.
If only Musk would use LSD or whichever drug helps to resolve those issues instead of ketamine.
You will get that war. The USA and China will clash and the EU is preparing to take care of Russia when that war starts.
It’s still possible to ask if Germany could have prevented it.