Considering how much your average Switch user plays online games, it might be even less justified for Nintendo to require a subscription than Sony or Microsoft. I really don’t feel like paying for that, just because I want to play MM2 every couple of months.

That sounds interesting, never heard oft it. Thanks.

That sounds interesting, never heard of it. Thanks.

I really don’t play enough on the Switch to justify subscribing to Nintendo Online (also: fuck you Nintendo that this is even a thing), but do I miss playing MM2. Such a great game, but literally unplayable without the subscription.

I’m pretty sure the Switch 1 is older than 4 years (and was cheaper than $500). And their games are actually quite good.

So Nintendo might be a fuckwad company, but your comment is still full of bullshit.

3 seconds? No, he didn’t even rang. Reattempt? No, he will take it to the nearest parcel shop. Nearest? No, some random shop in the city.

They just leave it at the door

Only if I’m lucky :(

As a German: It’s totally normal to order a glass of (soda) water when you’re in a restaurant for example. I personally prefer the good old Apfelschorle when I’m driving, which is not 0g sugar though.

the odds of you learning a 2nd language are slim

Tell me you’re American without telling me you’re American.

Instructions unclear. I have a desktop PC and now my monitor arm is broken. My 38 inch screen fell on the floor. You’ll hear from my lawyers.

I actually thought I am part of this blessed generation that can use a computer. But rotating a PDF? That beats me.

2D: Super Mario World. It just plays smooth af. Pretty close to a perfect videogame.

3D: Rayman 2. Platformers usually have a colorful and happy world. Rayman might still be colorful, but it stands out because it’s kinda grim. Gameplay wise… I should replay it, because I’m not actually sure anymore. I think all 3D platformers of this time could be a little bit janky. I remember there were some frustrating parts, at least for a kid.

I need an bigger living room