The thing about all these conspiracy theories about false flag killings, is why would you choose such an incredibly risky way, where the target could just as easily be accidentally killed if you get the windage wrong?

The reality is that is vastly more likely that they were trying to kill ICE employees, but since they were blindly firing at a van, they only hit detainees.

Or get shot to death, when an anti-ICE activist fires on your transport.

Israel was going for a death toll, they said it explicitly themselves.

AI “errors” had nothing to do with the outcome in Gaza. The IDF would have used another sloppier metric for targeting, they flat out don’t care as long as they still get money and US troops defending them.

The details in your own post undermine your conclusion. Ukraine has operated the Mi-8 family for decades, and is probably already familiar with low-level flight tactics over their own territory, which is a dissimilar flight environment to the US Southwest.

In reality this is more than likely pilot training for Southwest Asian operations. US still conducts some operations in the Middle East incase you weren’t aware.

Removed by mod

But that’s not socialism, is it?

Also you can try to argue that some methods of welfare distribution are inefficient, but you can’t argue that the needs are being ignored.

So your response is to make an irrelevant and sophomoric monologue?

You acknowledge yourself that the ideal tactics don’t actually work in Ukraine. And yet you never ask yourself why, and how you are supposed to mitigate the countermeasures.

Also, try not to accuse others of falling to a notion, when they give zero evidence for you to claim clairvoyance. Notice that I didn’t accuse you of falling for the “meat wave” notion, even though you were almost certainly alluding to it.

But did Jesus proscribe government welfare programs? It seems to be that the basis for “Jesus was a socialist”, is based on his teachings on charity. But this can be done by personal charity, and infact those are the examples he gave. Nowhere in the Bible does it say “you should vote for needs-based welfare programs”.

The obvious response to this is “companions in guilt”. It’s a meta ethics argument that essentially points out that moral reasoning is no different than other types of reasoning. There is no need for “genetic memory”, when like logic it’s simply a consequence of how human minds are structured.

Why don’t they have any APCs? What was causing them to lose them at such a high rate? Surely if they produce more of them, they won’t lose them again to the exact same battlefield tactics.

You complain about propaganda, yet the way you seem to avoid repeating the “propaganda”, is to regress to completely ignoring why APCs weren’t protecting troops anyway.

The reality is that in Ukraine, the drone and artillery concentration is such that armored vehicles aren’t effective. What is effective is having small agile units that can advance before the enemy can direct fire at them.

Later generations have more time to prepare for retirement, rather than simply axing the benefits of the people that have already retired.