

Shit, Trump could have shot Kirk himself, on camera, and his imbecile army would believe it was the ghost of Jimmy Carter if Trump said so.
This is actually unironically true, and it’s unbelievably sad.
Shit, Trump could have shot Kirk himself, on camera, and his imbecile army would believe it was the ghost of Jimmy Carter if Trump said so.
This is actually unironically true, and it’s unbelievably sad.
Calling it a plastic toywheel probably doesn’t help lol
Yep same here, I already got a brand new credit card with a brand new number because my renewal got stuck in a postal strike lmao
I think you mean Plex got hacked AGAIN
lol
It is, yeah. It’s like 100% of the reason for me. I’m gonna buy an iPhone later this year most likely.
I just don’t agree, I don’t see how victimizing someone twice when there’s absolute proof they are innocent is in any way productive or a good thing for society. It’s really shitty and can ruin someones life when they’ve already been through a traumatic event. It’s bordering on being downright evil tbh.
Yep, I defended myself against an intellectually disabled bully who bit me randomly, the teachers high fived him, and I got suspended for the day. I was super young at the time, but I still remember it vividly, and now that I’m older I’m lucky that it wasn’t worse and that they didn’t try calling the police on me at the time even though I was only defending myself but it was still a fucked up situation regardless.
Yeah, I do.
A home-owner was recently attacked by an armed man (who had broken into several homes before, he had a record of doing so, and had been arrested multiple times already) and was arrested and charged because he himself was armed: https://globalnews.ca/news/11345655/ontario-man-charged-with-assaulting-home-intruder-acted-within-his-rights-lawyer/
The crown prosecutor has not dropped charges so far.
Yep, but going through those motions is enough to ruin someone’s life because of ruining their employment prospects because of their name being associated with horrific crimes, even if they are entirely innocent.
Arresting someone because a crime may have occurred, without there being evidence to determine such, is not great, especially when there’s video proof that it was self defense. It’d now be up to a jury putting the home owner under a microscope to determine if the homeowner made the correct split-second decisions in a situation so stressful they can’t even imagine what it’s like because they never lived through it.
Yep, but going through those motions is enough to ruin someone’s life because of ruining their employment prospects because of their name being associated with horrific crimes, even if they are entirely innocent.
Arresting someone because a crime may have occurred, without there being evidence to determine such, is not great, especially when there’s video proof that it was self defense. It’d now be up to a jury putting the home owner under a microscope to determine if the homeowner made the correct split-second decisions in a situation so stressful they can’t even imagine what it’s like because they never lived through it.
Yes, they would likely arrest them anyway because a death (or multiple deaths) took place and let the crown prosecutor and then juries handle it.
Yep, but going through those motions is enough to ruin someone’s life because of ruining their employment prospects because of their name being associated with horrific crimes, even if they are entirely innocent.
Arresting someone because a crime may have occurred, without there being evidence to determine such, is not great, especially when there’s video proof that it was self defense. It’d now be up to a jury putting the home owner under a microscope to determine if the homeowner made the correct split-second decisions in a situation so stressful they can’t even imagine what it’s like because they never lived through it.
Their networking cards are great too. They just can’t come up with any answer to Ryzen.
In Canada, they’d probably arrest the home owner and have the courts sort it out. No joke.
I don’t think going to school prevents you from transitioning into a management role, nor does it seem to have prevented you from obtaining a career in the industry.
I don’t think it’s necessarily fair to blame your degree for a lack of management positions, you could always transition into management like others have done. I don’t think those others got hired into management specifically because they didn’t have a degree, or because they were high school dropouts. It’s entirely possible they only got into their roles through nepotism, which would have nothing to do with a degree or a lack of a degree anyway.
With that said, yeah, the money being made in the trades by business owners… yeah, that would have been nice, but even then there’s no guarantees that everyone can start their own successful business and make well into 6 figures and beyond.
Hi there, now you have my curiosity.
Which degree was it, why do you regret getting it?
I’ve never met anyone who regretted getting their degree.
I have met people who regretted not getting one because it closed doors for them (including talented people who were otherwise doing well at their jobs) so if someone is really going to forgo their degree, they should acknowledge it’s a risk.
Even if you don’t get a CS job you should still get your degree anyway, it will make getting other jobs easier. A degree is better than no degree.
I hadn’t heard of Forgejo, although I realize now that I have seen repositories using it before. I think it’s cool that they even have statically linked binaries of it but it’s a bit concerning that like an entire web server is built in because what if there’s vulnerabilities? I guess if you regularly stayed up to date it’s not too bad then.
What I don’t get is why do people think he wants them to mourn him? He made his thoughts on that pretty clear lol