I cannot — I performatively refuse to — believe that the meaning of « genocide », « fascism » and « nazi » — dogmas that shaped the fundamental beliefs of many generations —would be controversial again.

deleted by creator

We have experienced a very strange situation where the cons (unfortunately) fared far better than it ever did in its modern iteration while losing its momentous advantage, meaning that there is still somewhat of a reason for Poilièvre to stay in the race. He is also very arrogant, so he will not back down easily.

The low low rating of… checks note 40 something percent? How is it not rock-bottom already ? Imagine a stock-market crash under Biden. He’d be already impeached and looking for a job.

But does it break when water ?

Oh boy, I can smell all your issues from here.

Be wary, thee that enters this comment section.

When the ivory tower falls… it lands on something.

The time for dialogue is over. The party of ‘facts over feelings’ have proven to be incapable of proper reasoning.

Time to end relationships with all Fascist states.

A very Fisherian / žižekian critique. Aptly said.

He had so many ways of consolidating his grasp on his realm without looking like a total buffoon. That alone gives me hope.

Their protagonist syndrom is in full effect

I hate the fact that you are correct.

Legit question: in the face of all those disastrous town halls, why do they keep making them ?

Signed, confused canadian.

WHILE negociating a ceasefire deal, nonetheless !

I wish you were wrong. But I see no lies here.

I see ! Thank you for that :)

I understand what you mean, really. I just think the methods of circulating that info can sometimes seem or feel ecclesiastic.

In my opinion, context and rhetoric matter. That’s why I joked a little. But I don’t mean no harm, truly. And I appreciate what you do.

Original commenter: jokes in class solidarity

Response: « I appreciate the attempt, but what you said was wrong on sooooo many levels, in this essay, I will… »