

Most people with a driving license can’t even drive a regular car.
Most people with a driving license can’t even drive a regular car.
I didn’t imply that you can’t strip the protocol down to its bare essentials and still use it, but what’s the point of a protocol if everyone is on their own personalized version of it? Version / Feature fragmentation is a massive problem and basically none of the third party clients are up to snuff. Synapse is a massive bowl of lukewarm dog water, and most alternatives to it die in a year because it’s impossible to keep up. There’s too much shit in the protocol.
The protocol is bloated to hell so third-party clients stand no chance, and the foundation spends more time bikeshedding or pissing away money than they do developing. It’s a doomed project.
He thinks smartphone camera upscaling is AI slop
WHICH IT IS, but it’s not what he thinks it is
Content ID is a major part of how copyright currently works.
It’s literally not a part of how Copyright currently works. It’s how Google automated copyright claims on their platforms.
None of my creative works are in Content ID. People are not being sued through Content ID. Content ID flags stuff and at worst removes it. It is up to the copyright holder to decide what they want to do.
No it doesn’t. It would work like Copyright currently works.
I don’t need my works to be in any database for them to be protected by copyright. I simply have to declare their license or have the license be assumed by not declaring it. That’s how it already works. You, the owner of the copyrighted works, has to sue the infringer. It’s not an automated process. Your ‘likeness’ doesn’t need to be in any database if you can prove they used your likeness. Content ID was an attempt by Google to automate the removal process on their platforms so they could wash their hands of the problem.
Is Google your government?
Do you also think all of your creative works are in a government database somewhere?
That’s awesome; I knew I’d seen it around!
what is that little pixel cat at the top? It also appears on https://katia.ripe.net/ is it referencing something?
The combat and parkour of 2 are noticeably more floaty and forgiving than 1 and people (me included) were very unhappy with that when the game came out. We consequently never bothered playing it and the only people (still a sizable chunk of players) left are the ones who do enjoy it, even though it definitely betrays the design of the first game.
The grapple of the first game was a massive mistake but it’s easy to just not use it. Nothing in the game requires it.
The second game’s combat is forgiving and the parkour saves you where you would’ve fallen to your death in the first game. There are videos on YouTube of how egregious the combat and parkour lock-on mechanics can be where the first game doesn’t have them. It makes parkour and combat feel bad. People were unhappy with that.
But you can still think it’s a fun game. I’m not telling you what you feel is wrong, but the direction they took combat and parkour was wrong and many people pointed that out.
I’m not going to argue that you didn’t, or can’t, have fun, but people aren’t upset because it was different. The combat and parkour are objectively worse.
Not yet they haven’t
please i beg please god please
please have learned what made DL1 great and what made DL2 awful
Instances have 3 options. Save it locally, proxy it, or do nothing. Saving every federated image is not feasible for small instances. It’s not a fault of the protocol that instance operators don’t want to pay a thousand dollars a month for storage. Matrix has this problem, and look what happened to them: tiny instances are expensive to run, so don’t flourish.
whatever die mad I’ll keep being more productive than I’ve ever been
You’re listening to hype bros when you should be listening to developers.
There is a very loud population of AI-haters who don’t hate AI but rather corporate AI but they don’t know what the difference is and can be lead to water but won’t drink it.
If they wanted to stick it to the AI companies, they’d be all in on the open source LLMs. They’re not, though, because they don’t understand it. They’re just angry at this nebulous concept of AI because a few companies pissed in the well. Nobody was upset at AI Dungeon when that came out.
fuck no they won’t lmao
Please don’t get your hopes up