badwetter

@narr1@lemmy.ml Cool 👍🏼

@narr1@lemmy.ml The only way this works is for the ‘powers that be’ to control the media. In this the digital age, we can prevent that. Of course, federated media, like ours, has been co-opted by the ‘powers that be’ as one can see on worldnews@lemmy.world. Most are paid shills whose primary purpose is to bury the truth and keep THEIR narrative on the front page. Happy that they’re losing, although the EU has stepped up funding them in place of USAid. We have to be diligent to keep the truth in prominent focus. BTW, who is the “we” you’re referring to?

@narr1@lemmy.ml I agree the Russian’s have no interest in fighting the EU. It’s just crazy how the EU elites are behaving. It’s all a strawman. Even the American’s realize this, the EU has nothing whatsoever that Russia needs.

@HK65@sopuli.xyz https://www.euronews.com/my-europe/2024/07/16/with-war-on-its-doorstep-could-europe-embrace-compulsory-military-service-once-again

You live in a dreamland. Don’t take Wikipedia’s numbers as accurate. None of the EU militaries can send troops into a battle in any substantial numbers. Why do you think everyone in power is freaking out, FFS! Delusional.

@jlh@lemmy.jlh.name Nah, you’re trying to redefine the narrative. It won’t work, people are wising up to your B$! Wikipedia is wrong Europe doesn’t have the troop strength, and even if they did , would have nothing to fight with! Deluded… Perhaps you should visit a psychiatrist. LMAO

@BananaTrifleViolin@lemmy.world

What I find ironic, if the EU countries have as many soldier’s under arms as Wikipedia states, then they don’t need much more manpower. Look at the thread on worldnews where this is discussed. My comments were removed because I stated as much as this article premise. LOL!

@d00phy@lemmy.world

@lydon_feen@lemm.ee

You’re jealous