My parents wanted me to become Dr. Doctor. But I’m merely a Mr. Mister. So take these broken wings.

For a second I thought that was Sundar Pichai.

When somebody says they like Proton:

It’s been 4 whole hours and lemmings haven’t suggested Jellyfin or Navidrome or something yet?!

Why is the dpad censored?

Not sure what’s the idiom with “fridge” in it.

Technically, there’s a bundle that includes the game for $50.

My two favorite malaphors:

• It’s not rocket surgery.
• We will burn that bridge when we get to it.

I honestly don’t see this changing any time soon because there are biological incentives behind both stereotypes. And, anecdotally, my gf (40+) will pout if in some context I refer to her as a woman, and be like “noooo, I’m a girl… :(”. Semi-jokingly, of course, but only semi.

Stereotypically, women always strive to look as young as possible, so calling one a girl can be seen as a compliment. While men, stereotypically strive to appear mature, hence calling one a boy can be considered an insult.

Don’t you use a flathead for that?

Uses Too Many Big Words

Contention

How can one be chronologically disappointed? Did you mean “chronically”?

It was obviously sarcasm with that 100ths precision rating.

iDreams (Infinite Dreams) didn’t make the cut? I love their Sky Force games.

O

I’m not criticizing the screens, they are ok and I loved my Pebble Time Steel until the battery swelled and popped off the screen. I’m just saying that calling these e-paper is a deceptive marketing strategy.

From the Verge article:

The first watch that Migicovsky and Core plan to ship is called the Core 2 Duo (not to be confused with the old Intel processor), which Migicovsky says will cost $149 and will ship in July. […] It has the exact same black-and-white e-paper display as the old Pebble 2 (technically a transflective LCD, if you’re curious)

As I mentioned earlier, whether a screen type is considered e-paper is subjective. And in my opinion, reflective LCD isn’t a type of e-paper. You may disagree, but it’s not “categorically” wrong.