TheBroodian [none/use name]

I think this line of thought is dangerous. I think you’re right that Trump is doing reckless things, and will probably damage some stuff, but cheap stocks do not translate to the working class buying them and taking power. Capital may change hands from one sector of the bourgeoisie to another, but it won’t leave the hands of the bourgeoisie. It might spark some unification of the working class because the working class will always bear the brunt of anything that goes wrong, but it’s also possible that this frustration may be channeled into fascism.

What kind of socialism is able to simultaneously be socialist while excluding exploited and oppressed peoples? What kind of anarchy persists as anarchy upon the backs of those whose homes have been stolen from them?

The bias is justified. The left is correct. Markets don’t create wealth without necessarily simultaneously creating poverty