

Won’t matter.
He’s up against the state who have shown that I f they have to break their own laws they will
Won’t matter.
He’s up against the state who have shown that I f they have to break their own laws they will
But doesn’t that just affect his state charges? Aren’t his federal charges the one that are the real issue?
This is where i struggle agreeing with Marx, i find him to be selectively pragmatic and idealistic whenever the former or latter is convenient.
He acknowledges human nature is to oppress or be oppressed, as even in prehistoric human groups leaders would have formed and social rules enforced, we can assume this from our experiences in social groups. Yet does not believe that communism would lead to centralised oppression despite his historical studies, to me its either he chooses to ignore this factor or people misinterpret his writing and they cannot be applied in a post industrial capitalism society.
But is human nature not more acutely observed within the view of coercion, control and oppression? Marx says himself that the human history is defined by class wars between the haves and the have nots, with or without capitalism we will have a system that expresses control and oppression.
So everyone? Ain’t any Anglo Saxon around since that little old conquest of 1066