At this point run Linux in every device is already a meme.

This is the classical argument that capitalism is the best motivator of development since it is considered natural(selected as dominant till now) and by extension better fit for human nature.

Yet it is destroying itself, meaning he believes human nature will destroy itself, he then go on to say China is Capitalist, more specifically the government, that would assume the role of exploiter, then internally capitalism seem somewhat to be the exploiting structure reinforcing the idea of hierarchy and exploitation that generates more economic value and justify the inequality.

Probably because if it’s working it must mean it is capitalist in someway, they don’t conflate Cuba or another places with Capitalism because they don’t see the countries as economic powers.

The main differences would be that China invest in their workers, and Capitalistic countries don’t, the solution would be invest in the workers, but then he fails to notice that the failure of investing in workers isn’t a miscommunication or mismanagement, but a feature of capitalism itself that deny any handouts or any advantage to the masses to keep it up with the elite.

I mean, probably the ones who have an internal locus commit suicide at some point unfortunately. The fluidity of relationships today and people connecting by tech significantly increased the transactional aspect of modern life.

Gender wars are the easiest form of manipulation, you just need to get the extreme cases make a straw-men argument and generalize for both men and women to radicalize new people.

The statement of the main comment seems to be that capitalism is equal to exploitation and hierarchy, communism(or another placeholder) then is equal to end of suffering, exploitation and hierarchy, that’s why he/she sees capitalism as inevitable and communism and other ideologies seems utopic in comparison.

The article illustrate the Hypergamy concept. The men in that case might feel inadequacy after leaving the traditional role of breadwinner, which caused cognitive dissonance in his leftist views and make him vulnerable to the propaganda.

I agree, I’ve noticed that there is a push to make people think of AI as human to increase the acceptance, some media(movies,series…others) are stopping to depict it as a danger and more like a guardian or even a sentient companion like it could cross the programming and become human, it’s complex how vulnerable we are to projecting ourselves over other beings or things and develop parasocial or codependent relationships.

You are right, but nuts and seeds are also more expensive.

guilty untill proven guilty?

Oh sorry, I was thinking he was indicating that it could not be a human since 3M/2 is about 1,5M and it on the lower end on mens height, but he was saying that whatever it is on the map is 3M, I don’t think it is 3M in a single thing because it seems like a pile.

Is this really fine? Should we see AI as human?

What if isn’t industrialized killing, it could be about mantaining the success and order vibes that the prison represents as a solution, couldn’t it be a cover up for internal fights, violence, unusual punishments and other problems?

What is the average height of men in the country? Some countries have low height because of sub-nutrition and the google tool could have a minimal error margin, also a large black or crimson stain next to possibly incendiary material is worrying giving the context, maybe they could be some kind of disposal, since the country is hot I don’t think it is for heating if it is wood or something. Anyway this is wild articulation so idk

I think it’s because the fat or fish oils help with cognitive processes

This is possible, but you need to consider the context that the place is also a prison and in a hot climate country, it could also be gas or diesel stains reinforcing the idea of burning something.

Technocracy is more paternalistic than democracy, racism in the past was also backed by science and the firsts iq tests unfortunately, since the cost of doing science is often high it can be manipulated to political ends.

In my opinion they are scared, but feel protected by their social standing, the logical decision for them would try to stabilize their wealth and adapt to the changes or leave the country if they are politically ostracized.

America is becoming a technocracy and the political class are so paralyzed, they think a technocratic government would have space for them because they are rich and powerful now.

Don’t give scientists ideas, the somewhat dire wolfs are already here and all.

Do you people know some of those banking apps that work without google, maybe a list of them?

Do you guys remember when internet was the thing and everybody was like: “Look those dumb fucks just putting everything online” and now is: “Look this weird motherfucker so not post anything online”