It is in Germany’s security interest to keep Russian as a mayor military power as far away as possible

In times of Hypersonic missiles, ICBMs and fast transport aircraft distance is not a good shield. Germany must be able to defend itself, and it must reach that point FAST. I, personally, would not put too much trust in any ally willing to fight for germany - in this way i absolutely agree with de Gaulle who wanted a France that can stand up for itself - we need this for germany. Okay, it may be advantageous to let the Ukrainians bleed Russia a bit, but this is no guarantee for our national security.

It is also in Germany’s interest to build a rules based international order, where wars of aggression are punished

The “rules based international order” is dead since Bush invaded Iraq. We are now back in a situation more reminiscent to the time before the first world war, where shaky international support treaties and the age old concept of “might makes right” defines who rules what part of the world. We may not like it, but it is a fact… the faster we accept that, the better.

Why? Teslas are quiet the fine cars… ok, the CEO is a moron, but nevertheless…

Why should Merz stand in for Ukraine? He should stand in for Germany first, the EU second and anybody other than that a far distant third.

Dear Sir,

please regard my humble suggestion to fornicate with a skunk.

Do i say otherwise Yank?

Easy, just arm them to the teeth.

Or pull out entirely and prepare the remaining NATO for what it was founded: Protecting NATO territory, not engaging in this bullshit in ukraine.

Fuck Hamas

Muhaha… nee, ist klar… einem Museumsmitarbeiter ist die Bedeutung der Reichsflagge nicht bekannt…

Well… there is a winning situation for Israel (and i assume they are moving in this direction): No Palestinians, no further problems.

It is not that curious if you look at it from this point of view:

It is not uncommon that kids that got beaten by their parents will become abusive parents themselves. So… now look at what century long oppression and an pretty serious attempt at genocide can make out of a people if they get the means to stand up for their own. Hint: It isn’t pretty.

Hamas doesn’t surrender and 90% of the inhabitants of Gaza starves to death? WIN! Now you can “mop up” the remains and occupy the region with near to none opposition.

Hamas does surrender? WIN! You can claim a historic victory, jail every Hamas member that come forth and occupy the region with near to none opposition.

On a psychopathic level devoid of any ethics it is genious…

The nuclear arsenal and perhaps just a few conventional balistic missiles targeted at major population centers of the guest country are usually enough to guarantee the safety of politicians of major military powers.