Carighan Maconar

Why would it? It sees a road in front of itself, the whole car is built + programmed to go by what it sees, as an image.

The car is doing exactly what it is built to do. It just so happens that “safety of road traffic” is not among the things it is built for, and explicitly so.

Of course, if the styrofoam was even mildly damp, the Tesla will be rusting now. 😅

Well the set up is “Some rich fucker was idiot enough to dictate his company should not install LIDAR, no matter how strictly superior it’d be to do so”.

So I dunno. We could ask Melon Husk why he set that up, but I doubt he’ll reply. All Mark Robers did is observe the effect of the setup of Edolf Muskler. You’re right of course in so far that there’s not much to the video then, and I faintly remember there was a case a lot of years ago where a Tesla drove into a sky-blue truck because coming up on a crest it expected to only see hill, which matched the color of said truck.

Other way around.

Considering who is behind it, I just use Open Library. In particular because like you say, their actual data is much more useful.

Since you can apply that logic to everything, how can you ever build anything? Because all consequences are dire on a myopic scale, that is, if your partner dies because a single electrician cheaped out with the wiring in your building and got someone to sign off, “It’s not as bad as a nuclear disaster” isn’t exactly going to console them much.

At some point, you need to accept that making something illegal and trying to prosecute people has to be enough. For most situations. It’s not perfect. Sure. But nothing ever is. And no solution to energy is ever going to be perfect, either.