German source.

Translation (DeepL, no quality check):

Three US children from two different families were deported together with their mothers by the US Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency on Friday morning. This was reported by the “Washington Post” on Sunday, citing information from the lawyers of the families concerned.

According to the report, two mothers and their children were deported. According to the report, one of the children was a four-year-old toddler with terminal cancer. It was deported without medication and without being able to contact its doctors, said the family’s lawyer.

The lawyers for the families concerned stated that the deportees were initially arrested during routine checks in New Orleans. They were then taken to Alexandria in the US state of Louisiana, where they were unceremoniously put on a plane that flew the deportees to Honduras. In Louisiana, they were forbidden contact with their family members and legal representatives by the authorities, the report continues.

Judge wants to review deportation of two-year-old One of the deported mothers was deported together with her two-year-old girl. The child is a US citizen, but was deported together with her Honduran mother and her eleven-year-old sister.

Federal judge in the state of Louisiana, Terry Doughty, scheduled a court hearing for May 16 “in the interest of dispelling our strong suspicion that the government has just deported a U.S. citizen without due process.”

The US government argues “that this is all fine” because the undocumented mother had expressed a wish for the child to be deported with her. “But the court doesn’t know that”, the judge emphasized. At the same time, Doughty pointed out that the deportation of US citizens is “illegal and unconstitutional”.

It is illegal and unconstitutional to deport, detain or recommend the deportation of a US citizen. ~Terry Doughty

Lawyers had applied on behalf of the two-year-old’s father to have the child returned to the USA. Honduran President Xiomara Castro offered her country’s support to the mother and child on Saturday via the online service X.

Immigration authorities forbade contact with the father According to court documents, the girl had accompanied her mother and her eleven-year-old sister to an appointment with immigration authorities in New Orleans on Tuesday morning. About an hour later, her father, who had driven the family to the meeting in New Orleans, received a phone call in which he was simply told that the family had been taken into custody.

That night, the girl’s father was allowed to speak with her mother for only a minute before an immigration agent ended the conversation, attorneys said. The man did not have another opportunity to speak to his partner until after she was released in Honduras, they added.

Trump administration’s deportations heavily criticized Since US President Donald Trump took office almost 100 days ago, the authorities have been pursuing a restrictive immigration policy. Opposition Democrats as well as judges and human rights groups accuse the Trump administration of ignoring rights guaranteed in the US constitution when deporting migrants and not even granting a hearing to people threatened with deportation.

The executive director of the civil rights organization ACLU, Alanah Odoms, criticized the circumstances of the deportations to the “Washington Post”. “I don’t know how much more blatant and clear a constitutional violation can be than these recent deportations of US citizens without due process.” The deportations are all the more appalling “because some of these citizens are among the most vulnerable of the most vulnerable: Children. And not just any children, but children with serious medical conditions.”

On Friday, Federal Bureau of Investigation agents in the state of Wisconsin arrested Judge Hannah Dugan on charges that she obstructed an immigration detention of a migrant.

In March, “NBC” reported on the case of a deported ten-year-old US citizen. According to the report, she had a brain tumor and was being treated in the USA until she and her family were deported to Mexico. (mira, AFP)

  • Saik0@lemmy.saik0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    76
    ·
    edit-2
    18 hours ago

    Mother had legal custody.
    Father didn’t petition the court, his sister did.

    This story is stupid. It has nothing to do with Trump.

    Edit: For the downvoters…
    https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/69940863/6/v-m-l-v-harper/

    Mother had legal custody. And mother expressly desired to bring her child home with her.

    And ICE gave the “father” a chance to prove who the fuck he was… and he didn’t.

    First, Petitioner is unlikely to succeed on the merits of her claims. See ECF 1. V.M.L. is in the custody of her legal custodian – her mother. Neither Petitioner Mack nor the man claiming to be V.M.L.’s father have provided proof of their identities to ICE officials, much less any proof of legal custody, such that ICE may release V.M.L. into their custody.

    And the “petitioner” is NOT the father. As expressed here.

    Should her mother decide to allow Petitioner Mack and the purported father to take custody of V.M.L., V.M.L. is not prohibited from entering the United States.

    and

    Ex. A. Petitioner Mack, the purported Next Friend, does not suggest that she speaks for Ms. Lopez Villela, nor should such Next Friend status entitle Petitioner Mack to subvert the express, written desire of Ms. Lopez Villela.

    Edit2: Hah more downvotes. Just remember, you were yelling about separating families not that long ago. Now you’re advocating for separating the mother from her kids… to give to an unknown man who can’t produce anything to show that he’s even related to them. Wild.

    • EightBitBlood@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Nothing says MAGA like taking the highground over a kid dying of terminal cancer. Your prioties are just as fucking awful as the people you vote for.

    • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      10 hours ago

      Enjoy the bonus down vote for your asinine second edit proving you’re not just a stickler-for-legalism reply-guy and entirely missed the point. Is this one of those examples of conservatives approaching the world differently because they just fundamentally don’t understand the concept of empathy?

      • MegaUltraChicken@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        14 hours ago

        Is this one of those examples of conservatives approaching the world differently because they just fundamentally don’t understand the concept of empathy?

        Yes. OP never even considered that not deporting the mom with a fucking terminally ill child was even an option. Their literal first move is to rip this woman from her home, and justify it by blaming her.

        • Saik0@lemmy.saik0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          18
          ·
          12 hours ago

          OP never even considered that not deporting the mom with a fucking terminally ill child was even an option.

          Bullshit, you have no idea what I considered. Have you considered that the child’s mother might have options for healthcare in Mexico? That they chose to do this on purpose? Wouldn’t you think that the mother would have thought her options through?

          • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            17
            ·
            edit-2
            12 hours ago

            Have you considered that the child’s mother might have options for healthcare in Mexico? That they chose to do this on purpose?

            That they purposely got deported to Honduras because they have options for healthcare in Mexico? Pardon?

            • Saik0@lemmy.saik0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              13
              ·
              12 hours ago

              My mistake, Honduras. Was a few hours since I read the story and haven’t scrolled up in a bit. I was writing a post about how if I violated a law in Mexico I’d be imprisoned and deported all the same and that got stuck in my head I suppose.

                • Saik0@lemmy.saik0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  13
                  ·
                  11 hours ago

                  The child wasn’t deported. The mother was, and the mother chose to bring her child with her. The child was not deported.

                  • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    5
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    2 hours ago

                    You seem to think that leaving your terminally ill FOUR YEAR OLD CHILD alone in a foreign nation that just forcibly removed you, is a valid choice for anyone.

                    Just fucking delusional, dude. Stop and think about the implications of what you’re defending here… Have you heard of empathy?

                  • MegaUltraChicken@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    11
                    ·
                    10 hours ago

                    Which part of the boot tastes best in your opinion? I find it’s always helpful to have the opinion of a local when eating out.

    • gaja@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      40
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      18 hours ago

      The federal judge in the state of Louisiana, Terry Doughty, appointed for the 16th century. May a court hearing in “ in the interest of dispelling our strong suspicion that the government has just deported a US citizen without appropriate proceedings.” The US government argues that “all that it was all right” because the mother, who lives without valid residence papers in the US, had expressed the wish that the child would be deported with it. “But the court does not know this,” the judge said. At the same time, Doughty pointed out that the deportation of US citizens was “illegal and unconstitutional.”

      You’re arguing to deport a terminally ill American citizen out of state. We don’t have to kick out the mom just to scratch our racist itches.

      • Fredselfish@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        16 hours ago

        Guess the 4 year old was part of a gang. /s so we passed the Rubicon for deporting American citizens and we still haven’t shut this country down.

      • Saik0@lemmy.saik0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        37
        ·
        16 hours ago

        The child wasn’t deported. The mother has legal custody and chose to bring her child home with her. You’re literally arguing that we should separate child and mother and give the child to an unproven “father” expressly against the mothers will.

          • Saik0@lemmy.saik0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            30
            ·
            15 hours ago

            I didn’t miss any point. You lied. I called it out. And now you backpedal to a completely different arguement.

            • ripcord@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              13
              ·
              12 hours ago

              You seem to be assuming that people wouldn’t interpret the original situation as “don’t deport the mother”. Most people with empathy would have.

        • LilB0kChoy@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          20
          ·
          16 hours ago

          You’re literally arguing that we should separate child and mother

          I think the point you’re missing from the judge and by most people who are outraged by what’s been going on with the recent actions taken by ICE is the lack of due process and illegal removal of non-citizens.

          If the current administration and ICE weren’t in direct violation of the Constitution, the courts and the laws of the US then this situation doesn’t occur.

          • catloaf@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            14
            ·
            16 hours ago

            If the current administration and ICE weren’t in direct violation of the Constitution

            Or even basic human decency

          • Saik0@lemmy.saik0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            14
            ·
            12 hours ago

            If the current administration and ICE weren’t in direct violation of the Constitution

            ICE’s job of removing people who are in the country illegally is not in violation of the Constitution.

            • King3d@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              9
              ·
              12 hours ago

              Deportation isn’t unconstitutional. Skipping due process is. Learn the difference.

              • Saik0@lemmy.saik0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                10
                ·
                12 hours ago

                Okay, “learn the difference” person. What part of the process was skipped here for the mother to be deported?

                • King3d@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  8
                  ·
                  11 hours ago

                  ICE’s job of removing people who are in the country illegally is not in violation of the Constitution.

                  I’m only replying to the comment that you made. No need to argue in bad faith.

                  • Saik0@lemmy.saik0.com
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    7
                    ·
                    11 hours ago

                    If my response to you was in “bad faith” then your logical leap for me was also in bad faith. The previous poster claimed that ICE is in direct violation of the constitution. Then you followed up in claiming that they’re skipping due process. YOU brought that up. Now I ask for this case here what did they skip that would create a situation where a constitutional right was violated?

          • Saik0@lemmy.saik0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            9
            ·
            12 hours ago

            Define “they”. If I was to enter and remain in Mexico illegally I would expect to be deported. I’ve known many people that have committed very minor offenses and they were jailed for several days then deported. I don’t see how this is any different… except that the US gave the mother years.

              • Saik0@lemmy.saik0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                10 hours ago

                It’s really not.

                If you’re claiming that “they” is just the mother. She should be deported, she’s in the country illegally just as I would be if I was in any other country illegally.

                If your “they” includes the child, then it’s a bad faith argument as the child was not deported.

                But instead of actually communicating clearly, you just want to claim that my response is BS, when it’s not.

                • gaja@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  10 hours ago

                  “Um actually 🤓 the only logical response is to deprive the child of life saving medical attention or their mother.”

                  There isn’t room for good faith argument here. I’m done.

                  • Saik0@lemmy.saik0.com
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    4
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    8 hours ago

                    Incorrect. Healthcare could already have been addressed by the mother in Honduras. They do have hospitals and cancer treatment facilities.

                    And nothing stops the mother from re-petitioning correctly to return to the USA, unless she committed some felony crime. So not sure why everyone is under some belief that she would be unable to return.

                    I feel like very few people who comment here have ever been through the actual process to enter the country properly.

    • Zippygutterslug@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Callous disregard for human life is frankly insane, bit what’s crazier is trying to flex this in to an “I’m smarter than you,” comment

      • Saik0@lemmy.saik0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        25
        ·
        16 hours ago

        Mother chose to bring child with her… but somehow that fact is me being callous? Child is citizen and could have stayed. The child was not deported and can return.

        I think the mother is stupid for making the choice she did. but none the less this is not Trump’s fault. She could have left child here with the “father” if she was so worried about healthcare. She didn’t.

        Nothing about my comment was a “I’m smarter than anyone” thing. It’s me calling out shit reporting for making claims that are completely unsubstantiated.

        • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          edit-2
          12 hours ago

          Child is citizen and could have stayed.

          Just to be sure… You’re referring to the four year old child with a terminal illness?

          Just wanted to make sure I understood correctly.

        • catloaf@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          18
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          16 hours ago

          In what world is taking a child with cancer away from either her parents or treatment not callous?

    • MisanthropiCynic@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      12 hours ago

      The father is illegal so if he showed up competition he’d be arrested and sent away too.

      But yeah the mom wanted the kid with her. That’s fine, but they were checking in to their immigrant center and going through the legal steps and still got taken away

      • Saik0@lemmy.saik0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        11 hours ago

        The father is illegal so if he showed up competition he’d be arrested and sent away too.

        Not according to the articles I’ve read. The “father” (quoting because it’s still unconfirmed) was supposedly a citizen. But with reporting as shitty as it is, this could be a bullshit “fact” just like the claim that the 2 year old citizen was “deported”.

        they were checking in to their immigrant center and going through the legal steps and still got taken away

        ICE had final deportation orders… that usually means that the process was pushed to completion. Court case and all.