• Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    1 day ago

    Get better. That’s a very well known topic going back thousands of years. No need to be bitter and miserable. Your lack of understanding is your problem not other people’s

    • patatas@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Speak for yourself. Just read some of the thread being referenced and uhhh you might want to start listening

      • Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        8 hours ago

        Give me an example that’s legitimate. What exactly do you think is wrong how about that.

        Like this is as lazy as any r/the_donald comment. Which is also a super Astro turfed space where gauging a view based on the communities response is not the best thing to do

        • patatas@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          I mean first off, lol, because what does “legitimate” even mean in your philosophical system?

          Like, I dunno, Kant distinguishes between noumena and phenomena but he doesn’t then say that therefore it’s all a goddamn free-for-all where you can just say that lies are truth now, which seems to be your position.

          Hence me saying “listen to the people telling you that you are wrong about your entire epistemic framework”.