The reason is pretty darn clear and well documented.
To ensure the overtaking of the party by workers and leadership. The way labour was. Is impossible.
Equality including trans is part of the proposed founding. The roadmap to that founding process was sent out to supporters yesterday. And is expected to be complete by mid Nov.
Official website and most of the forums openly opposed and ban anti trans members. I say most. I’ve not found any that don’t. Only a few vocal idiots complaining about bans on social media. But it’s the internet. I’m sure these sad trolls gather somewhere. Nothing official agrees with or tollerats them.
Your repeated failure to understand how important membership authority is to a huge % of left wing supporters. And the processes required to make that happen. In no way backs up your accusations. And so far you have nothing else to support your claims. Your single MP example is (as all are until local members vote). An independent MP expressing his personal views. Not a party representative in any way.
The founding proposal is clear. Only local party affiliations will have any right to appoint MPs. Leadership will not be allowed to parachute supporting MPs into constituencies as Labour and the Tories do.
Yet you use the very process and time nessesery to support that. As some form of evidence the party fails to stand up to your ideals. It fails provide the proof you think it dose.
The reason is pretty darn clear and well documented.
To ensure the overtaking of the party by workers and leadership. The way labour was. Is impossible.
Equality including trans is part of the proposed founding. The roadmap to that founding process was sent out to supporters yesterday. And is expected to be complete by mid Nov.
Official website and most of the forums openly opposed and ban anti trans members. I say most. I’ve not found any that don’t. Only a few vocal idiots complaining about bans on social media. But it’s the internet. I’m sure these sad trolls gather somewhere. Nothing official agrees with or tollerats them.
Your repeated failure to understand how important membership authority is to a huge % of left wing supporters. And the processes required to make that happen. In no way backs up your accusations. And so far you have nothing else to support your claims. Your single MP example is (as all are until local members vote). An independent MP expressing his personal views. Not a party representative in any way.
The founding proposal is clear. Only local party affiliations will have any right to appoint MPs. Leadership will not be allowed to parachute supporting MPs into constituencies as Labour and the Tories do.
Yet you use the very process and time nessesery to support that. As some form of evidence the party fails to stand up to your ideals. It fails provide the proof you think it dose.