BlackEco@lemmy.blackeco.com to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 5 days agoGoogle won’t have to sell Chrome, judge rulesarstechnica.comexternal-linkmessage-square14fedilinkarrow-up1214arrow-down14
arrow-up1210arrow-down1external-linkGoogle won’t have to sell Chrome, judge rulesarstechnica.comBlackEco@lemmy.blackeco.com to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 5 days agomessage-square14fedilink
minus-squaresorghum@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up99·5 days agoThere wasn’t even a slap on the wrist in that ruling.
minus-squareerrer@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up27·5 days agoThis tells you all you need to know about how “punitive” this ruling was
minus-squareBetaDoggo_@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·5 days agoTo be fair anything short of selling chrome or breaking up the company would have a positive reaction. The possibility of losing chrome was priced in.
minus-squarePumpkin Escobar@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up30·5 days agoI liked googles response statement that they disagree with the ruling and are considering their next steps. You could hear the champagne bottles popping open in the background… and it was a written statement.
There wasn’t even a slap on the wrist in that ruling.
This tells you all you need to know about how “punitive” this ruling was
To be fair anything short of selling chrome or breaking up the company would have a positive reaction. The possibility of losing chrome was priced in.
I liked googles response statement that they disagree with the ruling and are considering their next steps. You could hear the champagne bottles popping open in the background… and it was a written statement.