• freedom@lemy.lol
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    55
    arrow-down
    24
    ·
    12 hours ago

    In a fair world, we would be celebrating our machine labor achievement and enjoy our free time. Instead we have capitalism and virtual luddites shouting to protect menial labor.

    Humanity… sigh

    • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      92
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      12 hours ago

      The luddites didn’t hate machines because they loved manual labor…

      They wanted to ensure that mechanization benefited the workers via less hours and increased wages rather than the same wages and less jobs to go around.

      Destroying mechanization was just an accomplishable goal in that fight.

      What you’re doing is falling for propaganda from a long ass time ago by the owner class…

      • Vanth@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        29
        ·
        12 hours ago

        same wages and less jobs to go around

        If we’re lucky. It’s more likely to be lower wages. “We don’t need to pay experienced programmers anymore, they aren’t writing the code after all. We just need cheaper, less skilled people to review the code that is already 99% fine”.

        💯 Not about the tech, it’s about who is going to use the tech to make life worse for the working class.

        • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          33
          ·
          11 hours ago

          The parrels between the mechanical loom for them and AI for us really seem like they should be obvious…

          But it’s crazy on Labor Day weekend people are shit talking the luddites

        • Serinus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 hours ago

          It’ll go the other way, eventually. Keep the experienced people who are willing to use AI and can handle the more complicated things AI can’t.

          But for now they’re just firing people and hoping things still work later. Since research and development both have delayed results, they can celebrate their win immediately and not pay the consequences til later.

      • Grimy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        10 hours ago

        What you’re doing is falling for propaganda from a long ass time ago by the owner class…

        Or using the actual current definition of the word. It’s like going on a rant about hunters when you get called a nimrod.

        I’m also going to push back on pretending the current anti-ai movement is against capitalism when it’s pro copyright. Their support is what big AI companies are using to create their monopoly.

        This centuries luddites aren’t tearing down machinery but helping build a walled garden.

        • deegeese@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          7 hours ago

          Trying to guess others’ motivations is a good way to show your own biases.

          I hate the copyright lobby, I just hate AI grifters even more.

          • Grimy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 hours ago

            I can only comment on the behavior I see. This is an online forum, I don’t have a choice but to assume.

            Regardless, most are very vocal about AI being theft, a line of thinking that directly benefits the copyright lobby and big AI. Big AI doesn’t mind paying for the data if it gives them a monopoly.

            The moment a chatbot does something mildly worrisome, like help draft a suicide letter, the conversation is filled with people calling for censorship, protection and regulation. Again, something that would directly benefit big AI.

            I’m also assuming they are against both the copyright industry and AI in general, just that most people seem to say things that help the copyright lobby and big AI without knowing it.

    • Gold_E_Lox@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      10 hours ago

      i guess?? but where does the energy and human labor come from in this “fair world”?? coal and wages?

      automated luxury space communism is not upon us, we are only a few hundred years from the advent of industrialisation.

      we are at the point were social democracies are barely functioning and fascism is still on the rise due to small time dilemmas and culture war. the working class has not been made conscious, and probably wont be for another couple decades.

      “ai” is just another corporate invention to steal and resell working class labor for the rich, the “fair world” you ask for was appropriated in the 50s for western exceptionalism and neo colonialism.

      edit for; this is a terrible description and barely touches the real world. i hope ypu understand what this drunk man is trying to say