Yours is two steps: think of something unexpected to have sex with, make a compelling argument for laughs.
Mine is one step : write up your secret sexual fantasy, the wilder the better. The “wildness” inherently provides subterfuge, because it makes people incredulous.
What you attributed to me was the task presented to both genders, not the explanation I gave. They were still supposed to come up with an explanation so I don’t know why you left that out in the latter
But you think the examples given were honest—Non-corporeal concepts?
Mine has one step. Yours has two: subterfuge and then we have to accept someone honestly evaluates the sexual viability of a mathematical theorem
Yours is two steps: think of something unexpected to have sex with, make a compelling argument for laughs.
Mine is one step : write up your secret sexual fantasy, the wilder the better. The “wildness” inherently provides subterfuge, because it makes people incredulous.
What you attributed to me was the task presented to both genders, not the explanation I gave. They were still supposed to come up with an explanation so I don’t know why you left that out in the latter
But you think the examples given were honest—Non-corporeal concepts?
This is the most autistic argument I’ve ever read on the internet, and my first browser was Lynx.
Whatup to all my altavista homies.
Bet you had a copy of this fucker too:
HotBot for life