The military said the back-to-back strikes on southern Gaza’s largest hospital were ordered because soldiers believed militants were using the camera to observe Israeli forces.
It’s tragic when the the made-up justifications for war crimes are so bad. The “Hamas surveillance camera” (news camera) wouldn’t justify the death of 20 people at any time. The IDF could have made up any lie they wanted and the Israeli public and international supporters would have believed it, and they chose to admit they murdered 20 people for a fucking camera.
Without offering evidence, Israel has in the past identified emergency responders who work under the Hamas-run government as militants to be targeted, including in the killing of 15 medics in March, when Israeli troops opened fire on ambulances in southern Gaza.
The information is there if you read it.
mourning the journalists killed by the terrorist state
Mourning the dead has no business being mixed in with news in a regular article - that belongs in an obituary or editorial. It sounds like you want the AP to compromise its journalistic integrity by offering unambiguous condemnation instead of cold facts.
does not accomplish as much as you think it does, because the plain facts allow people to find the truth already. Only a minority of people will be swayed
does harm that you are ignoring: it reduces trust in the outlet, and in journalism in general.
So yes, there is absolutely space for neutrality; indeed it is critical.
Stupid apology. Whatever is accomplish something or not doesn’t matter, israel murdered their journalists they should condemn it it is the human and professional thing to do
It’s tragic when the the made-up justifications for war crimes are so bad. The “Hamas surveillance camera” (news camera) wouldn’t justify the death of 20 people at any time. The IDF could have made up any lie they wanted and the Israeli public and international supporters would have believed it, and they chose to admit they murdered 20 people for a fucking camera.
Whst’s also tragic is AP spreafing idf excuses and did not even bother condemning israel and mourning the journalists killed by the terrorist state
From the article:
The information is there if you read it.
Mourning the dead has no business being mixed in with news in a regular article - that belongs in an obituary or editorial. It sounds like you want the AP to compromise its journalistic integrity by offering unambiguous condemnation instead of cold facts.
BS when someone murder your journalist willingfully there is no space for nutrality
Being biased (i.e. not being neutral):
So yes, there is absolutely space for neutrality; indeed it is critical.
Stupid apology. Whatever is accomplish something or not doesn’t matter, israel murdered their journalists they should condemn it it is the human and professional thing to do
Your comment is not in understandable English.